Talk:Buddy diving

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Merge with buddy line

Buddy line has been an unsourced one-liner since 2012. Buddy diving is the context for this equipment.• • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No comments in over a month, so have done the merge. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 15:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment for B-class

B
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.

  2. There are quite a few missing citations. Most are for uncontentious matters, but a few need to be provided. Not complete, but good enough. checkY
  3. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.

  4. Looks fairly comprehensive. checkY
  5. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.

  6. Structure looks good. checkY
  7. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.

  8. Looks OK. checkY
  9. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.

  10. More images would help, and should not be but surprisingly difficult to find on Commons. I would like to see one of buddy breathing or a rescue of some kind, but accept that this may take a while. checkY
  11. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.

  12. Looks OK. checkY

Not quite there, but near. A few critical references and a few images should do it. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 17:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added a few refs, most of the rest is fairly self-evident, so will accept at this level. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 16:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added one image. Much of the content is not image friendly so will accept what is there now. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 17:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting to B class. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 16:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Buddy diving. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Buddy diving. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]