Talk:Brucellosis vaccine
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Brucellosis vaccine.
|
Notability ?
As the current ref on this states "understanding and future approaches to vaccine development", this does not yet seem a product in current usage as still being developped. But until there is a product (after the research has decided whether live, attennuated or some other type of vaccine approach works best), should this article even exist yet ? David Ruben Talk 23:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
ATCvet then?
Shouldn't the ATC code be ATCvet, ie prefix Q? -DePiep (talk) 12:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)