Talk:Blood volume
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nadler's Formula
The Article is of poor Quality, it should include Nadler's Formular for the estimation of human blood volume. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.18.118.14 (talk) 15:45, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Blood volume. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6BqsfDDSK?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhypertextbook.com%2Ffacts%2F1998%2FLanNaLee.shtml to http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1998/LanNaLee.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606212907/http://www.drexelmed.edu/documents/ULAR/IACUC_drugs.pdf to http://www.drexelmed.edu/documents/ULAR/IACUC_drugs.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Why does it seem like mammals bleed so much more than anything else?
I have looked offsite and confirmed that birds, frogs, fish, and mammals all have roughly the same ratio of blood to body weight. But we mammals seem a lot more prone to spilling our blood than anything else in the world, and I wonder why that is. This applies even in water ... e.g. a fish that gets bitten will not stain the water red and may go on swimming with surprisingly severe injuries, but when we slaughter whales, the water stains deep red for what seems like miles. Have mammals lost some evolutionary adaptation that protects other animals from severe blood loss? My first thought was that water pressure keeps the fish's blood from spilling out, but why are marine mammals (including human divers) not also protected by this phenomenon? Furthermore it seems that even terrestrial animals, outside of mammals, seem less prone to bleeding than we are. And I was surprised to find out that their blood volume is similar .... e.g. this frog picture led me to believe that frogs, being cold-blooded, have very small blood volumes and are able to survive even so because of differences in metabolism, but ... apparently the average tree frog has a blood volume of 75ml/kg, spot-on the exact same as humans. —Soap— 14:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
