Talk:Betavoltaic device

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electrical engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I would love for someone knowledgeable to incorporate into this article any useful info from this page critical of recent betavoltaic claims: http://www.phact.org/e/z/betavoltaic.htm

The first half of the "Drawbacks" section can be rephrased as "Betavoltaic batteries will discharge over time." To which one is tempted to ask "You mean, as opposed to every other battery type out there?". Someone is reaching. 70.113.95.84 (talk) 01:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A laptop computer for example requires a minimum of say 25W to operate. It cannot operate on say 20W; so a betavoltaic would start out producing 40W (say) but after a half-life of 12 years for tritium it would only produce 20W. The battery would have to be supplemented by a small Li-ion battery and only operate 19 hours a day. Granted this is not the end of the world (boo-hoo, a battery that only lasts 12 years), so maybe this should be taken out. The real reason why this kinds of battery probably won't be used is because people will precieve them as "nuclear" and therefore "dangerous". Can an expert in the subject enlighten us? Would this battery be any more dangerous than say the mercury in monitors and light bulbs, or the lead in old batterys?98.207.171.2 (talk) 13:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is difficult to compare radiological hazards (e.g. beta emitters) with chemical (e.g. mercury or lead).

The dangers of beta-voltaics can be minimal. Beta particles are easily shielded, and a betavoltaic can operate without increasing the user's external radiation dose rates. Tritium is especially a very weak beta emitter, and it will not increase the user's external radiation dose. Certain beta emitters do not produce radioactive daughters (e.g. tritium decays to He-3), and thus are generally used for betavoltaics. If the radioactive material is suspended or incorporated into a solid material, radioactive contamination is minimized. Even with all that, there is still the danger of internal radiation dose (a person inhales dust from a crushed betavoltaic, a person ingests it, etc.). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.167.53.3 (talk) 19:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very very low power

I have the feeling that one gram of tritium generates less than a watt of raw power. If I multiply the mean electron energy by the number of Becquerels or if I use E=mc² with the mass loss from tritium to helium-3, I get approximately the same figure. The MIT blog (near the end) explains that the experimental device generated some nanoWatts. I can also imagine that one gram of tritium is very very very expensive and that you'll never find enough tritium to power many consumer devices. -- Xofc (talk) 19:32, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Output is indeed low and I wouldn't expect to power a wireless mouse this way but the widespread use of Tritium radioluminescence suggests there may be uses for small amounts of electric power. Jim.henderson (talk) 23:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Betavoltaic device. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321184926/http://blog.kinectrics.com/nuclear-energy/the-dawn-of-nuclear-batteries/ to http://blog.kinectrics.com/nuclear-energy/the-dawn-of-nuclear-batteries/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC) {{Done|Jim.henderson (talk) 23:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Efficiency

What would be the typical efficiency? And are there issues with combining that mode of power conversion with thermal processes? Like having betavoltaics convert the betas to power and a separate system (e.g. Steam generator) convert the waste heat from gammas hitting the shielding or so... Hobbitschuster (talk) 21:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Betavoltaic device

Very very low power

External links modified

Efficiency

Navigation menu

Search