Talk:Bernadine Healy

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

No Mention of Her Attempts At Privatising/Patenting DNA?

Her conflicts (Signs of Life ISBN 0-395-73530-0) with James.D.Watson were legendary, so much so that eventually Watson resigned from the NIH on the grounds that she was attempting to acquire the patents on DNA.Twobells (talk) 17:43, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

9-11 Red Cross Response section

Disclaimer: I work for the American Red Cross National Headquarters in D.C. as a Social Engagement Specialist. Changes I make or suggest to articles related to the American Red Cross are done in good faith, with the aim of correcting incorrect information and maintaining Wikipedia's standards of content.

Removed statement on Red Cross not responding to Pentagon crash (listed as a reason Healy received criticism), because although there were many other criticisms related to the American Red Cross and 9-11, this was not one of them. Sources: Washington Post archive

Portsmouth Daily Times (Google archive) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riaglo (talkcontribs) 20:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Details on edit of section on WHI regarding decline of sales of HRT

The HRT (hormone replacement) drug market in the United States simultaneously dropped by $1 billion, twelve months after the study's results were publicized, as 60% fewer women stopped filling their HRT prescriptions.[citation needed]

It appears the entire section on WHI has remained without citation for seven years! Along with that, the phrase "60% fewer women stopped..." is convoluted and implies what is probably the opposite of what the author intended - which we assume was 60% fewer women refilling their prescriptions. However, without a citation, it's unverified. This particular statistic is not vital to the point of the paragraph, so I'm deleting it, and adding a citation to support the claim that the market dropped by $1B and that this was a 50% drop. -Tzf (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy re vaccines

"She suggested a government conspiracy against further research in a nationally televised CBS interview with Sharyl Attkisson" . The source given doesn't mention the word "conspiracy" and it's not clear to me that the interpretation of her words is exactly that. GraemeLeggett (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Agreed. I therefor changed the text to the following:

“In a nationally televised CBS interview with Sharyl Attkisson, she alleged that the government has avoided studying whether there are any susceptible population sub-groups in which vaccination may result in autism, because of a fear that if such a link were found between vaccines and autism, people would stop vaccinating.” JustinReilly (talk) 22:02, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]