Talk:B symptoms
![]() | B symptoms was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Anyone...
... have anything to add? I can't think of anymore to say on the subject that isn't covered on the Hodgkins or NHL pages. MastCell 19:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
I have added some material to entry Prognosis that might assist in defining prognostic - I'm willing to help a bit in this regard. Mikebar 07:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
GA nomination
GA articles need to be written in "compelling prose, and (be) readily comprehensible to non-specialist readers;"
Unfortunately, there are several specialised terms used in this article that are not defined and the prose style is highly technical. A more general introduction saying what lymphomas are and what other diagnostic methods are used might help. Have you also considered a historical section commenting on when these symptoms were separated from other causes of fever? You mention a few other diseases that may cause similar symptoms, how are these differentiated from lymphomas? What is the physiolocical/pathalogical mechanism causing these symptoms?
Examples of undefined terms - prognostic, histologic grade, treatment modality
This article is however very well referenced and obviously the work of an expert in this field and will may the core of an extremely good article on this subject in the future. TimVickers 02:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input... I'll keep working on it. MastCell 20:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)