Talk:Asprosin

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Article needs to be reviewed

…by people with a broader knowledge of the disease states involved. Before my arrival, the article focused on the one Baylor paper, and its institutional PR and the immediate science news reports thereafter. I have begun to remediate this mis-focus, making clear that the association between progeroid features and FBN1 mutations long predated the discovery of the hormone. An authoritative review by experts in this area is needed. Le Prof 73.211.138.148 (talk) 22:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion of Marfan lipodystrophy syndrome would probably better fit as a subsection of the article on Marfan syndrome. This article is about the hormone. The Cell paper published by Chopra and his coworkers is at this point the only paper I am aware of that has been published concerning the hormone. I feel the focus in this article should be the hormone. --Robert.Allen (talk) 03:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Asprosin

Article needs to be reviewed

Navigation menu

Search