Talk:Amphiphile

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amphiphile article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Is it really necessary to use the world "prolate" in this introduction? Natisto (talk) 14:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone give a good reason why the word "moiety" links to "functional group"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.229.84.213 (talk) 22:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because the two terms are used interchangeably in protein chemistry. --Dan|^(talk) 10:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

amphipathic alpha-helix ?

I would like to see a section on amphipathic alpha helices here, as they are an important aspect of protein structure. I don't see exactly how to fit this in to the current structure, however. Also, I think the article should be called Amphipathic, with a redirect from Amphiphile. The latter is much less commonly used. --Dan|^(talk) 10:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Amphiphile/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

rated top as high school/SAT biology content (actually amphipathic, which redirects here) - tameeria 14:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC) This article has no references. - tameeria 17:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 00:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Amphiphile

Untitled

amphipathic alpha-helix ?

Assessment comment

Navigation menu

Search