Talk:Aflatoxin

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Untitled

Saddam Hussein is known to have developed and produced Aflatoxin as an economic biological/chemical weapon

Takometer, do you have a reference for this claim? JFW | T@lk 21:08, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

add a new section

hey, i fixed the Iraq part, but i was thinking: is the material contained in the "contamination conditions" section starting to get beyond the scope of that subheading? perhaps we need to think of a new title or possibly split Zvesoulis 21:57, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The 3D structure of aflatoxin B1 is incorrect. The methoxy group is on the wrong carbon.

history

i think that if historical issues of usage are going to be referenced they cannot be part of its chemical and medical properties and they would better be mentioned seperately, on a new paragraph or a new page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.249.61.130 (talk) 10:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Afaltoxin in Virtually All Peanut Butter

In regards to the missing citation, This is a reference to a study done by Consumer Reports in 1990. I have no access to the magazine and therefore cannot give a citation...but if anyone does, that's where that citation would be located... Grillo7 01:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intrested in this... 98.24.154.187 (talk) 22:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq/history

I've never added or edited before, so I'll leave the info here for someone who knows how. Iraq under Hussein did indeed produce & weaponize aflatoxin. (This was significant because previously aflatoxin had not been considered as a biological weapon.) Research & production began in 1988, and live-fire tests were conducted in 1989 & 1990. During the first PG War, bombs & missile warheads were loaded with aflatoxin & deployed, though obviously never launched. This information was disclosed in 1995 following the defection of Hussein Kemal Hassan to Jordan. According to the declaration, 2200L of concentrated aflatoxin were produced, with 1580L loaded into munitions & the remainder reserved. At the time of disclosure, Iraq claimed to have unilaterally decided to abandon their BW program in 1991 and to have inactivated & destroyed their munitions & stockpiles, but no evidence to support this claim was presented. This information was reported in UNSCOM's October 1995 report to the UN Security Council; I would think that document would still be on the UN website [1] for citation.

There's a different question posed of whether this info belongs on this page. I'd say it belongs somewhere; if that isn't here, then this page needs a link to that somewhere. But, I'm just a newbie; again I'll leave it up to the experts.

Hope this info helps! 192.91.172.42 13:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just read the complete report on possible exposure to nerve and biological agents published in the American Journal of Epidemiology by the Naval Health Research Center: 

* Oxford Journals
   * Medicine
   * American Journal of Epidemiology
   * Volume 150, Number 5
   * Pp. 532-540

There is in fact no evidence at all of illness related to destruction of munitions purported to contain biological weapons agents. The report makes the point early on that the UNSCOM reported the existence of sarin and cyclosarin in munitions that the U.S. Army had previously examined and declared to have no traces of biological or chemical weapon agents. This information is public knowledge and can be retrieved in moments by going to the website for the American Journal of Epidemiology and searching on "aflatoxin iraq", which is what I did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 18:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manufacturers

This section makes no sense to me. The article give no info on any practical use of this substance, so why would it ever be manufactured by anyone? I think this should be addressed in the article. Pouru 02:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fair question, I have updated the section with a possible use. V8rik 17:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that the assay standard units in which aflatoxins are sold are minute, and that they are prohibitively expensive. It would be impossible to purchase an amount sufficient to poison someone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 18:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information in pets

Recent news headline concerns the presence of aflatoxin in certain pet foods http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/12/19/pet.food.recall/index.html Should this be incorporated into the article? Sire TRM (talk) 01:01, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory statement in first paragraph vs microbiology section

First paragraph states: Aflatoxins are naturally occurring mycotoxins that are produced by many species of Aspergillus...

Microbiology section states: They are synthesized by only a few Aspergillus species... Sah64 (talk) 00:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Readability

any chance of a summary paragraph for those of us who don´t have a PHD in Chemistry? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.148.123.64 (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amerocentric

The page only gives US (FDA) action levels. As I understand it, these are something like 10 times HIGHER than EU allowed levels, at least for cereals (cf: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:050:0008:01:EN:HTML) - i.e. 20 micrograms/kg in the US vs. 2 micrograms/kg in the EU. Isn't this a point worth noting, and can we not in any case reduce the US bias of this article?

This is a burning issue in the Balkans right now (Serbia in particular), where a very dry growing season has led to high levels of aflatoxin in animal feed and hence in milk - well over the allowed EU levels, but not over the US level. So they changed the allowed level - easy solution, instant healthy milk! Here is a bit about that, though not sure about the figures they give: http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2013&mm=03&dd=08&nav_id=85055. So WHAT is actually an "allowable" dose..? Markowe (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Query

" Favorable conditions include high moisture content (at least 7%) and high temperature. "

Did the author mean 70%? 216.228.28.22 (talk) 19:18, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • No. For example A. flavus grows best on corn at 18% moisture content but will not grow below 12%. Other foods require even lower moisture content for safe storage, for example almonds and red chillies. Hevesli (talk) 13:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

By the revision [2], the date format Month DD, YYYY had been established. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Aflatoxin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aflatoxin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aflatoxin not present in meat?

https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/article/10.1007/BF02544571

I just wanted to point out this study... Do you guys think we should conclude that afflatoxin is not a health risk factor in meat? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urgeblind~enwiki (talk • contribs) 00:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Causal relationship through epidemiological studies

“causal relationship between childhood stunting and aflatoxin exposure has yet to be conclusively shown by epidemiological studies”

Epidemiological studies can’t establish causal relationship, perhaps “definitive association” or something similar would be more fitting. 2001:1C05:240A:5100:6C64:20E3:39FA:27D0 (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pharmacology Tyranny using State Income/ Low-Income Health Insurance; For-Profit Listed under Non-Profit & Taxable; Ex. Luxury Purposes

$$$$$$$ Listed as "Non-Profit" Drug Marketing: * Making Profit in a Pharmaceutical Company/-ies in the United States using a collaborative Stock Market Investing. Equal Opportunity ( Communism ); Equal Opportunity Increases caustic Non-Productive society and also Increase in Abortion deaths and Also an Increase of Sociological and environmental problems. This conflict of "Equal Opportunity" versus the Education seeker/ self-future..attempt of creating Independence from a system of EQUAL OPPORTUNITY being dependent on a human ... for science projects and ignoring opinions AND also grievances to Non-Profit Companies of continued Mal-practice of Drugging persons against their will.. For THEIR ( the "Non- Profit" PROFIT in their Investment of FINANCIAL GAIN upon a "false", but true emotional drugging experiment. After requesting the "Non-Profit" to pay me for Their Science study ... I need a Lawyer. I DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS IN A PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG. A Man-Made Drug Compounds and White Collar crimes ARE NOT FROM GOD. So, I have mentally been fighting this rape I reported To a local Mental-Health Agency... from an employee from this specific "Non_Profit Mental Health agency" The Mental-Health NON-PROFIT Agency ignored several complaints and grievances... I NEVER gave CONSENT for this "Non-Profit" for PROFIT financially prospering off of their employee raping me... With this, it leads me to believe they would like to Become Bankrupt. $$$$$$$$$$$$$ We are NOT On Earth for your Profit and Your Deafness.... WITHOUT ABORTION YOU ARE IN DEBT.... DEPENDENTS on Flesh Bodies are not to be OWNED by SCIENCE.... The United States Constitution I HAVE A RIGHT TO DEFEND MYSELF... I am starting to believe you are with uhh... The Mafia... ALL THESE WORLD RELIGIONS .... Try a bit of Prevention and PAY MALPRACTICE DEBTS IN MY STATE OF OHIO. ( AUTOMOTIVE; Coal Mining; Gasoline Industry; Law Enforcement; Military; NOT HOLLYWOOD... Not for Quackery's LUXURY arousal and obsession of human SCIENCE EXPERIMENTS down here on Earth . Please * QUIT TESTING ON HUMANS * ... You are NOT "in the Field" NOR Have you VOLUNTEERED. Your GREED IS KILLING US "Blue_Collar" Slaves, down here...... Ungratefulness will get you into Hell. 

 ALLERGENS in MOLD?   - Louis Pasteur Cutless77 (talk) 21:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Aflatoxin"