Talk:Advanced Tactical Laser

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Laser power and class error

This article states: The laser will be a 100 kilowatt-class chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL). It is expected to have a tactical range of approximately twenty kilometers and weigh about 5,000–7,000 kg. This program is distinct from the Airborne Laser, which is a much larger system designed to destroy enemy missiles in the boost phase.

I understand that the 100 kw laser is solid state and is much lighter. It is not a COIL system. The Airborne Laser is a megawatt system and uses COIL. Please verify and correct this article. See: http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=184609 http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=184242 Figlinus (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image caption

Currently, the image caption says "AC-130 with Advanced Tactical Laser onboard" or something like that; yet, there is no concrete mention anywhere else of an AC-130 gunship mounting the weapon--only that the ATL was mounted on a C-130. Unless the addition of the weapon automatically changes the C-130 to an AC-130, the image caption should be changed to match the picture's description, which does in fact say "C-130." — Preceding unsigned comment added by The paccagnellan (talkcontribs) 00:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Advanced Tactical Laser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]