Talk:Acne scarring

Proposed merger

I think that acne scar treatment should logically belong in acne scarring. It would make the latter page more comprehensive, and I think it's useless to have a separate treatment page when the content could easily be copied into the scarring page. Aristotle1990 (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. --SilyOlPooh (talk) 02:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I second the motion. Dictouray (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Completely agree. --Pbroks13 07:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

This is right --08:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[Raman Chalotra]

Both should be merged into acne vulgaris, the parent article. B.Wind (talk) 04:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Makes sense to merge the two —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpwood (talk • contribs) 20:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

agreed. Mahanmd (talk) 03:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Really one of the most biased entries on Wikipedia to serve the cosmetic enhancement industry. The page reads unabashedly like an advertisement by the practitioners. Silas10961 (talk) 11:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

 Done acne scar treatment was essentially word for word copy of this article, so merged together. Now to consider issue of merging into Acne#Treatment... David Ruben ^Talk

Picture

How about one? I want to know what it looks like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.237.81 (talk) 18:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC) hello —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.62.147.96 (talk) 02:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)