MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/September 2019

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

chng.it

Redirect site for locally blacklisted change.org. Soapboxing: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Needs some cleanup. --Dirk Beetstra T C 06:58, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Beetstra: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OPEN

This is a relatively new, and legitimate Italian news website. It's an online news service, created and supported by one of the most famous Italian journalists, Enrico Mentana. I think it is automatically blocked because of the ".online" in the URL. Can it be unblocked without removing the block to all the other ".online" domains? --Ritchie92 (talk) 12:10, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More test: http://open.online --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:43, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie92: Not blocked, see ^^. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie92: I saw the link, www.open.online/2019/03/17/la-stecca-del-pd-sul-voto-delle-primarie-risultati-ufficiali-impossibili/ ... something else is blocking it, I can't pinpoint it down. Your best bet is  Defer to Whitelist (just override the whole link, irregardless of the problem) . --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:53, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Beetstra: Thank you for your help. I actually just noticed that the request for the same link has already been made a few weeks ago here, to no reply yet. --Ritchie92 (talk) 12:57, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie92: I guess it is due to .*\.(ga|cf|ml|gq|online|site)/.*?\d{4,5}[-/]\d{1,2}[-/]\d{1,2}.* (which is likely added due to a lot of spam we received with movie cruft on sites with such a form). Maybe we should override the whole of open.online on the whitelist (I know that it could technically also be overridden in the blacklist rule, but that becomes quickly even less readable/understandable than what we now have and tracking becomes nearly impossible). --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:22, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Beetstra: I am no expert of the way the WP blacklist works. I guess a whitelisting of the full domain open.online would be a reasonable solution. --Ritchie92 (talk) 13:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Steroidcycle

Spammers

Please blacklist. -KH-1 (talk) 00:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KH-1: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Second

@JJMC89: - new link. -KH-1 (talk) 00:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KH-1: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ateaset.com

Has been used by this user a number of times. No legitimate use here. - Frood (talk!) 04:08, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

wewishes.com

Link is being spammed by a few IP's mainly on the Diwali article, but also seen on International Day of Yoga, Talk:Raksha Bandhan, Maharashtra Day, World Population Day, Thandie Newton,

Link is some blog so presumably this is an attempt to drive traffic to their site. Note that 103.79.228.49 also made an edit to .onion to change it to .onon, which happens to be a link shortening service that wewishes.com makes use of. See the bottom of the wewishes page. Not sure if it would be worth blacklisting that as well. Blackmane (talk) 14:03, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Blackmane: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. Also, m:Talk:Spam blacklist#onon.in — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nordvpn affiliate redirects

Nordvpn recently started an affiliate program, ever since there have been daily efforts to change the official link (nordvpn.com, please don't block that) to an affiliate link (go.nordvpn.net/XXXX) or a domain that redirects to one of these affiliate links (the other domains listed here). It is hard to imagine any circumstance where linking to one of these would be legitimate. - MrOllie (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie: I would prefer to block everything and open up a neutral homepage (e.g. a /about) of the site through whitelisting. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think that would be Link requested to be whitelisted: nordvpn.com/about-us/ - MrOllie (talk) 14:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@MrOllie: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've also whitelisted the about page. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now the company's official site is blocked but affiliate workarounds such as noɾdvpn.com are allowed and still being abused (I've just reverted such edit). Wouldn't it make more sense to allow nordvpn.com but block the various domains listed above, as they are the spammy ones? - Minor stab (talk) 08:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

additional nordvpn sites

@Minor stab: this is starting to be annoying:

It looks like there are many of them. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that they change the 'r' to 'ɾ' etc. This may need a more violent rule to block things. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Beetstra: As I mentioned above, the current rule isn't doing anything. It blocks the genuine website but allows the spammers to keep abusing the link. Any other options we could try? - Minor stab (talk) 11:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: We had something like this on meta, do you recall how we solved this in the end? (note, maybe this should be a global rule anyway). --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:29, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Beetstra: If you are talking about how we handle some of these globally, we have a couple of means, where they are slamming us with search type links, or standard components post the domain, we have some blacklist components that grab the tail of the domain and some regex for the problematic compinents; otherwise where they have uri components that we can identify as problematic there are abuse filters that we utilise to dissuade or disallow the addition. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:38, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
from a quick look at a couple of the COIBot reports for the blacklist maybe \.{2,4}/aff_c\?offer_id — billinghurst sDrewth 10:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Billinghurst: No, the strange characters: 'r' vs. 'ɾ', 'o' vs. 'ọ' ... it appears that nọrdvpn.com (notice the 'ọ', not 'o') does not get blacklisted properly --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Beetstra: ahhh, not noticed. We have been through numbers of funny characters failing in spam and title blacklist, so forget some of the solutions implemented. I remember that we did have some conversations about that at m:Talk:Spam blacklist a couple of (few?) years ago, though cannot find it in the archives by my use of search terms. Wonder whether we just omitted it as specific and just added a character space. Vaguely remember that we have had to go back through developers through Phabricator: ticket. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

review

Have we arrived at a point where we can conduct a montly or quarterly review of blacklist hits? The list is huge. I would suggest anything with no hits in 12 months could be removed. But can we get the stats? Guy (Help!) 23:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's going to be quite difficult. I figure you might ask an adminbot to periodically compare the listings at MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist against all hits on Special:Log/spamblacklist going back one year and post a report of all regexes that weren't triggered, but it's not something that could be trivially done manually. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thehindu.com

Pleas remove this site from blacklist. This is a very legitimate website with properly reviewed content Bikram Bagani (talk) 09:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bikram Bagani: In fact, it is not blacklisted, hence  Not done. In return however, do not use redirect sites (like tinyurl) to circumvent the blacklist, and please do not paste links to google resulst, instead link thehindu.com directly. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerian gossip forum

This is a Nigerian forum site where you can write every nonsense. (It's very similar, in fact worse than Wikipediocracy). I'm very shocked to see people using it as a reference. – Ammarpad (talk) 07:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have you discussed this at WP:RSN? We typically do not blacklist sites unless they are spammed. Guy (Help!) 07:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's being used in various articles as a "source" [6]. I don't think something as obviously unreliable as a user-generated forum needs discussion. If that's necessary, I am afraid I am not willing to start that discussion. – Ammarpad (talk) 11:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
​I've started a noticeboard discussion at WP:RSN § Nairaland. — Newslinger talk 08:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The noticeboard discussion (archived here) shows consensus for adding Nairaland to the spam blacklist. Can we please have this domain added? — Newslinger talk 13:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Pinging Ammarpad as a courtesy. — Newslinger talk 03:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

aaodekho.com

Website being spammed by very persistent person. Easiest just to nip this in the bud. Ravensfire (talk) 03:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

plus Added OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

linseis.com

linseis.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Linseis Messgeräte GmbH is german manufacturer for thermal analysis devices, also based in USA and China. Many years ago the site was blacklisted. I think a bad marketing agency was very spammy. we ask for the removal of the domain linseis.com from the blacklist. -- Aseiz (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2019 (GMT+1)*

 Defer to Whitelist I can't imagine how a link to this company would be useful anywhere outside of an article about the company, assuming that the company met WP:CORP notability. Whitelisting would be appropriate if such a situation arose. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

letterwhiz.com

letterwhiz.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com LetterWhiz is a site I use all the time, it's just a database of quotes and letter templates in multiple languages. I was trying to add a link to it on a wikipedia page, but it came up as blacklisted for some reason.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.237.145 (talk • contribs)

 Not done LetterWhiz is a site that used to be spammed here all the time, so we blacklisted it. As a reference, it has no conceivable use here so there's no reason to remove it or whitelist it. (Also; a fascinating coincidence that one of the IP addresses that spammed it heavily geolocates to Alberta, which is also where your IP geolocates to. Small world!) OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

STYLECNC

stylecnc.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

STYLECNC is a CNC machine manufacturer that has many useful contents for CNC, including user manuals, CNC solutions. I tried to add some contents referring from STYLECNC, I find it is in spam-blacklist, I can't understand why it is in, please remove this site from spam-blacklist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.90.191.207 (talk) 22:04, September 10, 2019 (UTC)

no Declined. Your answer is right there on your talkpage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:183.90.191.207. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:43, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

wapcar.my

wapcar.my: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

@Dennis Bratland: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Guy (help!) 12:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

joinncc.online

joinncc.online: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Website that is mocked up to look like an official site for National Cadet Corps, although "about us" says it's someone's blog; link to it was spammed to multiple articles: Three-star rank, United States Air Force rank insignia, National Cadet Corps (Singapore), Bangladesh National Cadet Corps, Bangladesh Air Force, National Cadet Corps (Ghana), National Cadet Corps (India), Air Force ranks and insignia of India. Schazjmd (talk) 13:11, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IQPC

iqpc.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

IQPC is a global b2b event company that has hosted a multitude of different events, including many events that could be cited as reliable sources. I'm not quite sure why it was blacklisted, looking through the logs I don't actually see IQPC, but only a website that's called \biqpc\.com perhaps there's an overlap there? If that's the case, I don't see any reason to keep it blacklisted. Thanks in advance! -- Zansher (talk) 11:34, 3 September 2019 (GMT+8)*

Beetstra, it would need consensus at WP:RSN first. Nothing about that site says WP:RS to me. Guy (help!) 12:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
JzG For the general case, yes. For an individual cases (i.e. specific link for a specific goal) it depends how and where the source is used (it could be a primary sourced used in an appropriate way, in which case a single whitelist could be performed without the RSN discussion). --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am less inclined to offer encouragement to accounts whose first edit is requesting whitelisting of a spammed domain... Guy (help!) 14:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

glowinsta.com

Spammed by

Repeated spam in social media-related articles for a website selling fake social media followers. Continuing spam at Social media use by businesses after final warning. GermanJoe (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

casinobonusesfinder

  • Link/text requested to be blacklisted: casinobonusesfinder

Spammed by

Deceptive spamming for a casino bonus site by socking single-usage accounts, adding trivial commonplace info to hide the actual spam link. As the site has several country-specific mirrors (.ca, .co.uk, .de, .com, etc.), a Regex-based general filter would probably be more efficient. GermanJoe (talk) 13:48, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

subweb.co.il

Spammed on SEO-related articles by three disparate IPs in the span of four minutes:

The domain is registered in Israel (the website is in Hebrew) and seems to be for a marketing firm. The IPs however, geolocate to Algeria, Bangladesh, and Luxembourg. Given all these factors, this seems like a pretty deliberate spam attempt. Opencooper (talk) 23:30, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Opencooper: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nordvpn.com

nordvpn.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Wikipedia was spammed by [presumably] NordVPN's affiliate partners, who would redirect the link AWAY from nordvpn.com to sites such as nordvpnoffer.com and go.nordvpn.net. The last such edit took place after nordvpn.com had been blocked - the spammers changed the link to nọrdvpn.com (note the special character). Therefore, blocking nordvpn.com did not stop the spamming. Another point: Currently the only whitelisted part is nordvpn.com/about-us/, which provides no actual information about the service but rather contains a lot of 'inspirational' corporate buzzwords. If we absolutely want to block the official website of the service (which makes no sense as explained above), we should at least whitelist a more relevant page, such as nordvpn.com/features/. -- Minor stab (talk) 10:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Minor stab: minus Removed from MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Credenceresearch.com

credenceresearch.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com This website is well known Market Research website in CA. I think due to some Asian spammers this website is in blacklist log of Wikipedia. Many time I refer this website in my thesis also big news giant like Forbes, USAToday, SAP, Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance refer this website into their posts (you can see the citation list on websites' homepage). This website have great research contents of ICT, Automotive & Aerospace. I also informed websites' owner about this and they changed their hosting provider also they blocked the specific area IPs of asian countries. I request you to please remove this website from your blacklist.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Robson7252 (talk • contribs)

@Robson7252: I have said this before, who is spamming Wikipedia is not our problem, our goal is to protect Wikipedia from the influx of unwanted links. I am not convinced that delisting will get that goal. I prefer to send this to the whitelist for specific links that can be shown to be needed.  Defer to Whitelist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 05:47, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note that a similarly named user, Robsoncredence (talk · contribs), posted a request here a couple of months ago. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A few passing mentions in blogs, opinion pieces and trade rags are not sufficient to establish credibility, such publications would use any source that supports their marketing agenda. None of the company's claims about their expertise, size, and anonymous testimonials is verifiable. Digging a bit deeper, I found an interesting external report highlighting the problem with this kind of "researchers". Just a bit of background info, of course the blacklisting is entirely valid. GermanJoe (talk) 11:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch, GermanJoe. I note the address of Credence's San Jose office is the US Post Office building in downtown San Jose. Draw your own conclusions! OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spam content at Dexbrompheniramine/pseudoephedrine

User Rreagan007 (talk · contribs) was recently blocked for edit warring at the article. The concern regarded this edit by Doc James (talk · contribs), which was repeatedly reverted by Rreagan007. There is consensus at the talk page that the content that was removed is basically unreferenced spam, hence this request. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:01, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has gained 'reviewer' rights on this wiki. As it is the only editor it seems I will leave this for now, if it recurs on other accounts (or the editor persists after the block expires) it can be blacklisted. (pinging Doc James, the ping above did not work as there was a typo in the name). --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beetstra sounds reasonable. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:01, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Healthcare spam

Continuing spam after multiple and final warnings. Pseudo "healthcare" websites that prey on elderly and poor people for a quick buck. GermanJoe (talk) 11:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any other spammers? This one's blocked. Guy (help!) 23:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not at the moment - the block was unusually quick. I'll double-check in a few days. GermanJoe (talk) 00:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just to note that the editor makes some rather strange markup-errors (making my link-extraction-regex failing on them). --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Spam continued after the first short-time block expired. For probably fraudulent sites, I'd recommend blacklisting even after relatively few spams. The owner had enough warnings as it is. GermanJoe (talk) 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Guy (help!) 19:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spam on Andaman Islands

I have seen this marketingwebsite coming by before but I can not find where. Now a new account posted it on Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Andaman Islands. Useless spam. The Banner talk 18:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OPEN

open.online: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

This was just removed by the archive bot, but actually one editor, Beetstra, already agreed (see the archive) that it should be removed from the blacklist. The website open.online is a relatively new, and legitimate Italian news website. It's an online news service, created and supported by one of the most famous Italian journalists, Enrico Mentana. Now there is another URL of this website that I would like to add as a source but I can't (I can't even post it here unlinked). I hope that this time the whole website could be whitelisted. Thank you. --Ritchie92 (talk) 12:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie92: It cannot be removed, as it is the tld online that is blacklisted (and hence, all domains on that TLD are blacklisted). I suggested to whitelist open.online, hence  Defer to Whitelist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect "offers" to change search engine

Clicking the /indexen.php link on Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Ballia redirects here, offering to perform a "security check" and change the user's default search engine. Miniapolis 02:39, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Miniapolis: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. This was presented as the official website, but right now it shows every evidence of being a cybersquatter. --Guy (help!) 23:07, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sambad lottery spam

Each inserted multiple times over the last couple months on Sambad. Special:Diff/917066105, Special:Diff/917065852, Special:Diff/911044785. A number of other siimlar links URLs have been added as well, but this seems to be the most common one.

fwiw, the others are:

- Frood (talk!) 03:23, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Frood: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

specific pages

Is it possible to block an individual page without blocking an entire domain? One of our ongoing long-term abusers has started creating pages linking to a google post (posts.google.com/share/ZazhHI6x), as a way of trying to manipulate search robots, since the top-level domains (lovifm and its variations) he was previously spamming are already blocklisted. Would it be possible to filter individual pages like this, to make spamming a little more difficult for this LTA account? PohranicniStraze (talk) 23:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PohranicniStraze, can be done, just propose them above and we will format them appropriately. There is also stuff possible with XLinkBot and abusefilters. —Dirk Beetstra T C 05:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

saadatrent.com

404 replacement SEO technique across a variety of articles, mostly tourism related. Ravensfire (talk) 15:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The most cunning of SEO techniques. plus Added to blacklist. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

issd.org

Continued spamming for a steroid website by a new sock (Darooka) after warnings and socking blocks of the first 3 accounts. GermanJoe (talk) 07:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I have blocked Darooka for the spamming and for attempting to delete this report. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
plus Added, thanks for the efforts of Wikier23. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:44, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

blanked this report. --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

klikfilm.org

Spammed by these two IP's here and on the Serbian Wikipedia. (meta COIBot report) It might be beneficial to blacklist this here; it's a spam site. Vermont (talk) 01:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vermont:  Defer to Global blacklist, cross-wiki problem. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Vermont: Handled on meta. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Beetstra, I didn't add it globally as it was only two IP's in the same small range on two projects; I thought it would be better to handle it locally. Vermont (talk) 03:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Vermont, yes, it is small .. but edits like this do show a high level of disregard. There is no reason for them not to spread further. —Dirk Beetstra T C 04:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. There's also little chance that site could be used for anything other than spam. Best, Vermont (talk) 13:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

naanii.es

Combination Polo and 'Lifestyle' blog, will never be a reliable source for anything. Has been added off and on for about a year (see Lavili's contribs) but that has recently escalated to edit warring and sockpuppetry. Time to stop wasting everyone's time with this one. - MrOllie (talk) 17:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MrOllie, can you check the COIBot reports, there seems to be a xwiki component here, and a much larger set of accounts. Maybe meta? —Dirk Beetstra T C 17:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

paisabazaar.com

Spammed by:

Repeated spamming and promotional editing for a credit website. Previous warnings and a short IP block have been ignored. Purely promotional website without credible information for an encyclopedia. GermanJoe (talk) 10:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

dietpills.best

The site is a sister website of issd.org (already blacklisted, see above), cross-linking to the blacklisted domain and obviously maintained by the same spammer for steroids. Continued spamming after various warnings and blocks (see previous case). GermanJoe (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Guy (help!) 21:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/September_2019"