Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-10-25/Arbitration report
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Discuss this story
- Seems like an overdue, much-needed restriction is finally in place. StrPby (talk) 00:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm now curious as to when the last time the ArbCom had zero open cases before them. Is it possible that it dates to the committee's founding? Powers T 20:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- No, there have been other instances, though it is not frequent. (In general, as is mentioned in the arbitrator interview article elsewhere in this week's Signpost, the committee has fewer full-fledged cases come before it these days than it used to, which of course increases the odds that there will be none pending at a given moment.) Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- So no news is good news. (It looks kind of steange to see an empty Arnb report)SYSS Mouse (talk) 17:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- No, there have been other instances, though it is not frequent. (In general, as is mentioned in the arbitrator interview article elsewhere in this week's Signpost, the committee has fewer full-fledged cases come before it these days than it used to, which of course increases the odds that there will be none pending at a given moment.) Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- A sad day. There can't be many of us 2002 (or earlier) folk left editing. — Hex (❝?!❞) 02:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
← Back to Arbitration report