Wikipedia talk:WikiProject District of Columbia

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject iconUnited States: District of Columbia Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia.

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 21:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant categorization discussion

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_12#State_or_territory for discussion of including the District along with states and territories in category schemes. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DC Tech article

I've submitted two drafts on DC Tech and its history - while the first draft needed some work, most recently my submission was denied in a driveby review for reference/notability by a deleted user/bot. I've looked at Wikipedia's articles about Technology Clusters and would say "DC Tech" is now in the top 25% in both notability and article quality. The current re-review queue is 2 months long. Can someone help me get this accepted? Caywood (talk) 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Mary McLeod Bethune

Mary McLeod Bethune has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]