Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Piotrus 3
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Edit count for Piotrus
| Username: | Piotrus |
| User groups: | autoreviewer, epcampus, epinstructor, filemover, reviewer, rollbacker |
| First edit: | Apr 10, 2004 17:34:12 |
| Unique pages edited: | 45,674 |
| Average edits per page: | 3.59 |
| Live edits: | 158,837 |
| Deleted edits: | 5,313 |
| Total edits (including deleted): | 164,150 |
Namespace Totals
| Article | 83020 | 52.32% |
| Talk | 28510 | 17.97% |
| User | 3999 | 2.52% |
| User talk | 17105 | 10.78% |
| Wikipedia | 11926 | 7.52% |
| Wikipedia talk | 6453 | 4.07% |
| File | 607 | 0.38% |
| File talk | 29 | 0.02% |
| MediaWiki talk | 4 | 0.00% |
| Template | 2109 | 1.33% |
| Template talk | 2043 | 1.29% |
| Help | 3 | 0.00% |
| Help talk | 6 | 0.00% |
| Category | 1789 | 1.13% |
| Category talk | 75 | 0.05% |
| Portal | 572 | 0.36% |
| Portal talk | 416 | 0.26% |
| Draft | 1 | 0.00% |
| Education Program talk | 10 | 0.01% |
Month Counts
2004/04 73 2004/05 94 2004/06 313 2004/07 230 2004/08 256 2004/09 265 2004/10 274 2004/11 589 2004/12 663 2005/01 1125 2005/02 437 2005/03 752 2005/04 869 2005/05 1143 2005/06 1286 2005/07 1545 2005/08 675 2005/09 479 2005/10 1819 2005/11 2074 2005/12 1552 2006/01 1551 2006/02 1847 2006/03 1851 2006/04 2146 2006/05 2069 2006/06 2180 2006/07 2525 2006/08 906 2006/09 1412 2006/10 1698 2006/11 2043 2006/12 1613 2007/01 1786 2007/02 2705 2007/03 2504 2007/04 2807 2007/05 1663 2007/06 1466 2007/07 3202 2007/08 1789 2007/09 2413 2007/10 2212 2007/11 2104 2007/12 2876 2008/01 1771 2008/02 2417 2008/03 2153 2008/04 2103 2008/05 1748 2008/06 1732 2008/07 1322 2008/08 1435 2008/09 1781 2008/10 1982 2008/11 1517 2008/12 1331 2009/01 1488 2009/02 1890 2009/03 2029 2009/04 1613 2009/05 1646 2009/06 1042 2009/07 1289 2009/08 840 2009/09 1009 2009/10 1420 2009/11 1849 2009/12 689 2010/01 63 2010/02 73 2010/03 311 2010/04 1082 2010/05 617 2010/06 659 2010/07 254 2010/08 1145 2010/09 607 2010/10 385 2010/11 647 2010/12 1117 2011/01 1039 2011/02 877 2011/03 1848 2011/04 783 2011/05 1413 2011/06 1859 2011/07 750 2011/08 1549 2011/09 1640 2011/10 1595 2011/11 1624 2011/12 1179 2012/01 806 2012/02 1139 2012/03 712 2012/04 1301 2012/05 2133 2012/06 1194 2012/07 808 2012/08 1172 2012/09 1269 2012/10 1679 2012/11 1404 2012/12 721 2013/01 789 2013/02 704 2013/03 1476 2013/04 1872 2013/05 2314 2013/06 1228 2013/07 1075 2013/08 1004 2013/09 1542 2013/10 1417 2013/11 1385 2013/12 543 2014/01 1493 2014/02 404
Top-edited pages
Article 516 - Józef_Piłsudski 453 - Polish–Soviet_War 386 - Armia_Krajowa 351 - Polish_culture_during_World_War_II 311 - Katyn_massacre 299 - Constitution_of_May_3,_1791 297 - Soviet_invasion_of_Poland 292 - Polish–Lithuanian_Commonwealth 268 - Invasion_of_Poland 247 - History_of_Poland_(1945–89) Talk 311 - Armia_Krajowa 226 - Józef_Piłsudski 211 - Polish–Soviet_War 148 - Katyn_massacre 134 - Soviet_invasion_of_Poland 128 - Władysław_II_Jagiełło 123 - Invasion_of_Poland 115 - Boleslaw_I's_intervention_in_the_Kievan_succession... 114 - Vilna_offensive 110 - Polish–Lithuanian_Commonwealth User 1293 - Piotrus 453 - Piotrus/Sandbox/Archive 253 - Piotrus/Morsels_of_wikiwisdom 172 - Piotrus/Sandbox/Notes 165 - Piotrus/Links 122 - Piotrus/Sandbox/163x 96 - Piotrus/Babel 88 - Piotrus/Sandbox/Prof 77 - Piotrus/Sandbox/Notes/SocMov 74 - AlexNewArtBot/PolandSearchResult User talk 803 - Piotrus 278 - Halibutt 274 - Volunteer_Marek 171 - Poeticbent 152 - Irpen 132 - Renata3 127 - Nihil_novi 110 - Malik_Shabazz 102 - Appleseed 95 - Moonriddengirl Wikipedia 429 - Requests_for_arbitration/Eastern_European_disputes... 346 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents 228 - Administrators'_noticeboard 225 - Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement 209 - Academic_studies_of_Wikipedia 135 - Requests_for_arbitration/Piotrus/Workshop 128 - Reliable_sources/Noticeboard 123 - Village_pump_(technical) 123 - WikiProject_Poland 123 - WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment/Requests Wikipedia talk 1860 - WikiProject_Poland 376 - Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern_European_mailing... 185 - Naming_conventions_(geographic_names) 171 - WikiProject_Sociology 149 - WikiProject_Military_history 122 - Identifying_reliable_sources 109 - Did_you_know 99 - Good_article_nominations 95 - Ambassadors 93 - Naming_conventions_(use_English) File 8 - Gg_first.jpg 8 - W_samo_poludnie_4_6_89-Tomasz_Sarnecki.jpg 7 - Battle_Isle_1_screenshot.png 7 - Pilsudski_in_Kostiuchnówka's_trenches.jpg 7 - Zapluty_karzel.jpg 6 - PerfekcyjnaNiedoskonalosc_cover.jpg 6 - 26PPAK_relief_Warsaw_Uprising.jpg 6 - 1Comp_obwSambor_inspecDrohobycz_Burza3.jpg 6 - Starcie_belwederczykow_z_kirasjerami_rosyjskimi_na... 5 - Belarus_1939_Greeting_Soviets.jpg File talk 7 - Polish-Ukrainian_and_Polish-Soviet_Wars_early_1919... 4 - Rycina_1752_Palac_Branickich.jpg 3 - Vilnius_Operation_April_1919_Przybylski.JPG 3 - Kielcepogrom.jpg 1 - Nationalities_in_Second_Polish_Republic_ca._1931.p... 1 - Poland_First_To_Fight.jpg 1 - David_Barkley.jpg 1 - Schleswig-Holstein_fires_at_Gdynia_1939.jpg 1 - Sociology_wikiproject_talk_page_views_2012.png 1 - Windows_ActiveX_security_warning_(malware).png MediaWiki talk 1 - Spam-blacklist 1 - Spam-whitelist 1 - Sitenotice 1 - Gadgets-definition Template 24 - Foreign_relations_of_Poland 23 - Polish_truces_and_peace_treaties 23 - Did_you_know 20 - Campaignbox_Polish_September_Campaign 18 - Sejms 18 - Honorverse 17 - Polish_Underground_State_sidebar 17 - History_of_Poland 14 - Did_you_know_nominations/The_ScareHouse 14 - Did_you_know_nominations/Business_tourism Template talk 1692 - Did_you_know 14 - Unreferenced 13 - Gdansk-Vote-Notice 9 - History_of_Poland 8 - The_Holocaust 7 - Age_of_Enlightenment 6 - LGBT_in_Japan 5 - WPBannerMeta 5 - ACE2010 5 - WikiProject_Poland Help 1 - Archiving_a_talk_page 1 - How_to_move_a_page 1 - Citation_tools Help talk 2 - Citation_Style_1 1 - Interlanguage_links 1 - How_to_move_a_page 1 - Interwikimedia_links 1 - IPA_for_Polish Portal 503 - Poland/New_article_announcements 12 - Poland/Selected_anniversaries/general 10 - Ukraine/Ukraine-related_Wikipedia_notice_board 8 - Ukraine/New_article_announcements 6 - Belarus/New_article_announcements 5 - Germany/New_article_announcements 3 - Poland/Selected_location/9 2 - Poland 2 - Poland/Selected_location/5 2 - Poland/Did_you_know Portal talk 357 - Poland/Poland-related_Wikipedia_notice_board/Archi... 16 - Poland/New_article_announcements 5 - Poland 5 - Poland/Archive_1 4 - Russia 3 - Belarus 2 - Current_events 2 - Lithuania 2 - Poland/Selected_biography 2 - Poland/Selected_picture Draft 1 - Steve_Tomasula Education Program talk 2 - Hanyang_University/Collective_Intelligence_in_Prac... 1 - Hanyang_University/_English_Readings_in_Informatio... 1 - Hanyang_University/Sociology_of_Globalization_(Fal... 1 - Hanyang_University/_English_Readings_in_Informatio... 1 - Hanyang_University/_English_Readings_in_Informatio... 1 - Hanyang_University/Sociology_of_Globalization_(Fal... 1 - Hanyang_University/Collective_Intelligence_in_Prac... 1 - Hanyang_University/Collective_Intelligence_in_Prac... 1 - Hanyang_University/Sociology_of_Globalization_(Fal...
Edit count updated as of 05:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC) by ///EuroCarGT 05:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Statement by 153.19.58.76
Canvassing
50+ WikiLove messages in the last 24 hours (9/10 February 2014; especially 10 February, around 16h)→ [1] During an ongoing RFA - this might look like a subtle form of canvassing?! --IIIraute (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- So I aint the only one to think it's pretty odd!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's not subtle, it's blatant. Was just about to ask a follow up to my Q7 when I saw this. Leaky Caldron 20:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hmmm, did I mention RfA in them? I believe I didn't...? Anyway, the stats above show that I've left 17105 user talk page messages in this project, 50 a day is not unusual to me. Many of today's messages come from my regular Monday weekly review of User:AlexNewArtBot/PolandSearchResult; I habitually leave dozens of messages each Monday. This week I didn't have to leave almost any prods (there are weeks I have to leave dozens on Monday...), and as I felt extra good today I decided to spread some additional overdue happiness to the hard working DYK admins and few others. I recommend you try it out. IIIraute, I believe you have never given a wikilove message before - go on, saying good things about others, assuming goof faith, and practicing Wikipedia:WikiLove in general is a very healthy attitude, recommended by one of my favorite WikiProjects, the Wikipedia:Kindness Campaign. Now, I cannot defend against bad faith interpretation that my regular edits are some form of "subtle canvassing", how could I prove otherwise? My messages don't mention nor do they link this RfA, so no, I don't see what's the problem with me sending them out. Few days ago my name was on a mass delivery WikiProject Poland newsletter, was it a subtle form of pre-campaigning, too? A some GF, pretty please. I'll, however, say this: spreading happiness to other Wikipedians is much, much more important to me than passing this vote. If in order to pass (or to gain a few votes) I'd be required not to tell others they are doing good job, and thank them for their contributions, so be it. I consider passing this RfA a much less important item in the grand scheme of things than ensuring a number of hard working Wikipedians get their long deserved thank you; if I can motivate only a few people to reconsider leaving, or increase their activity, then I'd have done much more than I every could with the tools. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- WP:AGF isn't a noose. Nudging 50 people the day after you RfA (with a total 9 in December & January, AFAICT) can be regarded by anyone as anything, including encouraging people to see what you are up to via your recent contributions. Leaky Caldron 21:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Mind you, I did five edits to RfA page, and about one hundred fifty in the last two days or so, so my contribs shouldn't be that blatantly self-advertising, I'd hope. Through this thread is changing this a bit, I think it's my fourth edit here... Does it mean I am abusing our discussion here to promote my candidacy? Hmmm, I can see how one could argue for that. Should I have stayed silent then? Surely no-one would treat the silence as a silent admission of guilt? Do or don't, whatever I do, I am damned, aren't I? :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- What do you say to this → [2] --IIIraute (talk) 22:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nice tool. So I guess I was using WikiLove for three years now, huh? I certainly like it more and more. As I said, you should try it, too! PS. This tool doesn't account for non-WikiLove messages, I used to leave lot of traditional thanks, too. See also [3] and [4]. Hmmm, I think I often didn't leave a descriptive summary, instead of starting a new section I'd piggy back on the last one at the bottom of someone's talk page; I am not sure how to account for but I am afraid those edit summary searches will be missing a lot of my barnstar and such edits. Sorry about that, not sure how to run a query to give you the full results. PPS. I just remembered - I wrote a mini wiki essay on the importance of those kind of edits few years back. It should explain my thoughts on this further. PPPS. As well as the refs I cite there for why giving out wikilove and similar awards is a great idea: Wikimedia Strategy Taskforce for Community Health Recommendation #1: Volunteer Recognition, Positive feedback works for editing, say Wikipedia editors, SBU study finds informal awards contribute to higher Wikipedia participation. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- ...well, you certainly liked it a lot "more and more" in the last two days. --IIIraute (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Last 50 - two days. Prior 50 - two years. Sorry, but this stinks.--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- I'm a bit pissed off that I didn't get a barnstar. I even had a drink with him in Boston. Drmies (talk) 04:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Last 50 - two days. Prior 50 - two years. Sorry, but this stinks.--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- ...well, you certainly liked it a lot "more and more" in the last two days. --IIIraute (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nice tool. So I guess I was using WikiLove for three years now, huh? I certainly like it more and more. As I said, you should try it, too! PS. This tool doesn't account for non-WikiLove messages, I used to leave lot of traditional thanks, too. See also [3] and [4]. Hmmm, I think I often didn't leave a descriptive summary, instead of starting a new section I'd piggy back on the last one at the bottom of someone's talk page; I am not sure how to account for but I am afraid those edit summary searches will be missing a lot of my barnstar and such edits. Sorry about that, not sure how to run a query to give you the full results. PPS. I just remembered - I wrote a mini wiki essay on the importance of those kind of edits few years back. It should explain my thoughts on this further. PPPS. As well as the refs I cite there for why giving out wikilove and similar awards is a great idea: Wikimedia Strategy Taskforce for Community Health Recommendation #1: Volunteer Recognition, Positive feedback works for editing, say Wikipedia editors, SBU study finds informal awards contribute to higher Wikipedia participation. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Per Sphilbrick. I noticed as soon as it happened but as I had already !voted, and as mentioning it (or changing my !vote) would not have impacted on the outcome, I let it go. Certainly gave me pause though. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- What do you say to this → [2] --IIIraute (talk) 22:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Mind you, I did five edits to RfA page, and about one hundred fifty in the last two days or so, so my contribs shouldn't be that blatantly self-advertising, I'd hope. Through this thread is changing this a bit, I think it's my fourth edit here... Does it mean I am abusing our discussion here to promote my candidacy? Hmmm, I can see how one could argue for that. Should I have stayed silent then? Surely no-one would treat the silence as a silent admission of guilt? Do or don't, whatever I do, I am damned, aren't I? :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- WP:AGF isn't a noose. Nudging 50 people the day after you RfA (with a total 9 in December & January, AFAICT) can be regarded by anyone as anything, including encouraging people to see what you are up to via your recent contributions. Leaky Caldron 21:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)