Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Jake Wartenberg

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Edit stats from Edit Counter 01:42, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

User groups: accountcreator, autoreviewer, ipblock-exempt, rollbacker
First edit: Mar 20, 2005 18:31:10
Unique articles edited: 10,125
Average edits per page: 1.49
Total edits (including deleted): 15,085
Deleted edits: 1,047
Live edits: 14,038

Namespace totals
Article        5970  42.53%
Talk           188    1.34%
User           738    5.26%
User talk      5152  36.70%
Wikipedia      1683  11.99%
Wikipedia talk 99     0.71%
File           34     0.24%
File talk      1      0.01%
MediaWiki talk 3      0.02%
Template       37     0.26%
Template talk  114    0.81%
Help           2      0.01%
Help talk      1      0.01%
Category       15     0.11%
Portal         1      0.01%

Month counts
2005/03 1
2005/04 0
2005/05 0
2005/06 0
2005/07 0
2005/08 0
2005/09 0
2005/10 0
2005/11 0
2005/12 0
2006/01 0
2006/02 1
2006/03 0
2006/04 0
2006/05 0
2006/06 0
2006/07 0
2006/08 0
2006/09 0
2006/10 0
2006/11 0
2006/12 0
2007/01 0
2007/02 0
2007/03 0
2007/04 0
2007/05 0
2007/06 0
2007/07 0
2007/08 0
2007/09 0
2007/10 0
2007/11 0
2007/12 0
2008/01 0
2008/02 0
2008/03 0
2008/04 0
2008/05 0
2008/06 0
2008/07 0
2008/08 0
2008/09 0
2008/10 0
2008/11 0
2008/12 4563
2009/01 5624
2009/02 329
2009/03 448
2009/04 469
2009/05 1081
2009/06 1052
2009/07 139
2009/08 331

Logs
Accounts created: 78
Pages moved: 42
Pages patrolled: 603
Files uploaded: 17
Top edited articles

Article
 * 16 - Doug_Clark_(criminal)
 * 14 - Joyce_Gilchrist
 * 13 - Vicki_Robinson
 * 11 - Catherina_Margaretha_Linck
 * 11 - Francisco_Arce_Montes
 * 11 - Juliano_Verbard
 * 11 - Isaac_Zamora
 * 10 - George_W._Barrett
 * 9 - Orangutan
 * 8 - Ted_Hankey

Talk
 * 13 - Main_Page
 * 8 - Is_God_Dead?/GA1
 * 6 - Is_God_Dead?
 * 4 - Joyce_Gilchrist
 * 3 - Phil_Ochs
 * 3 - Emergency_contraception
 * 3 - Phil_Ochs/GA1
 * 3 - Barack_Obama
 * 2 - White_Night_riots
 * 2 - White_Night_riots/GA1

User
 * 59 - Jake_Wartenberg/monobook.js
 * 35 - Jake_Wartenberg/Articles
 * 25 - Jake_Wartenberg/notes
 * 12 - Jake_Wartenberg/huggle.css
 * 11 - Jake_Wartenberg/monobook.css
 * 10 - Jake_Wartenberg/notes/templates
 * 10 - Jake_Wartenberg/notes/to_do
 * 9 - Jake_Wartenberg/Status_explain
 * 8 - Lar/Liberal_Semi
 * 8 - Jake_Wartenberg_on_a_Public_Computer

User talk
 * 317 - Jake_Wartenberg
 * 15 - Stepshep
 * 13 - J.delanoy
 * 7 - Juliancolton
 * 7 - Synergy
 * 7 - NuclearWarfare
 * 6 - Mygerardromance
 * 6 - Jimbo_Wales
 * 5 - 204.113.52.170
 * 5 - 168.11.166.12

Wikipedia
 * 250 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism
 * 81 - Huggle/Whitelist
 * 58 - Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Subpage_-_Pending_cl...
 * 50 - Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Subpage_-_Open_suspe...
 * 35 - Administrators'_noticeboard
 * 28 - Help_desk
 * 22 - Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom
 * 18 - Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Subpage_-_Open_Check...
 * 14 - Good_article_nominations
 * 14 - Village_pump_(proposals)

Wikipedia talk
 * 16 - Sockpuppet_investigations
 * 10 - Edit_filter
 * 9 - SPI/bot_features_and_bugs
 * 7 - Meetup/Connecticut/April_2009
 * 4 - WikiProject_Japan
 * 4 - Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-01-24/Flagged_Revisions
 * 4 - Protected_editing_rights
 * 4 - Flagged_revisions/Trial
 * 4 - Autoreviewer
 * 3 - Requests_for_adminship

File
 * 5 - NorthamptonMassachusettsSeal.png
 * 3 - Rosenzweig.jpg
 * 2 - Ann_Dunham_with_father_and_children.jpg
 * 2 - Scaldwell.jpg
 * 2 - JephJacques.JPG
 * 2 - VRobinson.jpg
 * 1 - Panslabyrinthofelia.JPG
 * 1 - SCinterlock-trojans.png
 * 1 - Runescape-Logo.png
 * 1 - Spawn_Classic.jpg

File talk
 * 1 - Arctic.svg


MediaWiki talk
 * 2 - Revertpage
 * 1 - Sidebar

Template
 * 11 - Vandalism_information
 * 2 - SPI_inputbox_instructions
 * 2 - 1999_WNBA_season_by_team
 * 2 - Under_construction/doc
 * 1 - Gospel_music_articles
 * 1 - Premier_league_table_2007/08
 * 1 - History_of_Manchuria
 * 1 - Human
 * 1 - Muhammad_timeline_in_Mecca
 * 1 - Philadelphia_Eagles_roster

Template talk
 * 113 - Did_you_know
 * 1 - Wikipedia_ads

Help
 * 1 - Edit_conflict
 * 1 - Reverting


Help talk
 * 1 - Moving_a_page

Category
 * 2 - X1
 * 1 - Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Paparazzixox
 * 1 - A_Christmas_Carol_adaptations
 * 1 - Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Zooombabby
 * 1 - Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Pokemon123man
 * 1 - Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_RobertTanzi
 * 1 - Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_JakeValkusky
 * 1 - Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Kreativ_Kontrolla
 * 1 - Hyphen_Luddites
 * 1 - Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_OfficerJackBoot

Portal
 * 1 - Opera/Intro

Discussion moved from project page

Oppose (text redacted) Mr. IP Defender of Open Editing 07:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
note - redacted material involved an accusation that is the subject of an AN/I report with some stating that it must have been meant as a joke - Wikidemon (talk) 16:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That is an extremely strong statement, and one I am not sure is very relevant to his on-wiki actions. That said, I sure hope you are able to back up such claims. Tiptoety talk 07:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, though actually I hope he can't, liking Jake. If this is designed as a joke, or just to spoil a perfect RfA, please find some better way of doing so, or go play in the sandbox.--Wehwalt (talk) 07:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed +10000. Simply not funny, no matter how you read it, and could have off-wiki consequences (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree as well; such content is, simply put, libel. A very poor sense of humor, if this is indeed a joke. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs)help us! 14:01, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very serious accusation. Such things presented without any evidence are a serious legal matter. — neuro(talk) 14:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For sure, and I was somewhat stunned at the tenor of the responses I was getting at AN/I.--Wehwalt (talk) 14:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have redacted and indented this comment. While it may have been intended as a joke, it was both libellous and a strong personal attack. It is not acceptable to make serious real-life accusations about contributors' personal lives without good reason or evidence. ~ mazca talk 14:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed; if I wasn't worried about being overly bold, I would have indented the comment myself. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs)help us! 15:02, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Original comment. Thank you for redacting it, Mazca, I was in the same boat as Dylan. — neuro(talk) 15:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Being in no such boat, I was going to delete it altogether. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 15:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked Mr. IP for this egregious personal attack, and for reason's I cannot explain he responded by attacking a completely different Wikipedian with even worse personal attacks which I will not repeat. I have since increased the block. We need to protect each other from this sort of attack. Chillum 00:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming probably a lot more good faith than is warranted, I've asked him to provide 3 diff's in support of his rant... the "put up or shut up" principle. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 00:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was seriously considering a block without expiry. If his apologetic tone shows to be insincere and such a display is repeated I will revisit that consideration. Chillum 00:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]