Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Dpmuk

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Username:	Dpmuk
User groups:	reviewer, rollbacker
First edit:	Aug 20, 2007 00:16:52
Unique pages edited:	3,448
Average edits per page:	2.13
Live edits:	6,531
Deleted edits:	824
Total edits (including deleted):	7,355

Namespace Totals

Article	2375	36.37%
Talk	1006	15.40%
User	194	2.97%
User talk	1784	27.32%
Wikipedia	840	12.86%
Wikipedia talk	208	3.18%
File	23	0.35%
File talk	2	0.03%
MediaWiki talk	1	0.02%
Template	65	1.00%
Template talk	23	0.35%
Category	6	0.09%
Category talk	2	0.03%
Portal	2	0.03%
	
Namespace Totals Pie Chart
Month counts
2007/08	4 	
2007/09	0 	
2007/10	0 	
2007/11	6 	
2007/12	15 	
2008/01	4 	
2008/02	1 	
2008/03	1 	
2008/04	5 	
2008/05	0 	
2008/06	265 	
2008/07	123 	
2008/08	195 	
2008/09	317 	
2008/10	15 	
2008/11	0 	
2008/12	0 	
2009/01	19 	
2009/02	81 	
2009/03	231 	
2009/04	98 	
2009/05	127 	
2009/06	52 	
2009/07	283 	
2009/08	40 	
2009/09	143 	
2009/10	232 	
2009/11	12 	
2009/12	15 	
2010/01	8 	
2010/02	7 	
2010/03	89 	
2010/04	117 	
2010/05	195 	
2010/06	133 	
2010/07	127 	
2010/08	228 	
2010/09	25 	
2010/10	67 	
2010/11	232 	
2010/12	141 	
2011/01	731 	
2011/02	464 	
2011/03	204 	
2011/04	97 	
2011/05	150 	
2011/06	182 	
2011/07	43 	
2011/08	7 	
2011/09	15 	
2011/10	136 	
2011/11	105 	
2011/12	173 	
2012/01	341 	
2012/02	230 	

Top edited pages
Article

    49 - West_Ham_United_F.C.
    27 - Chelmsford
    14 - Engkanto
    13 - 2010_FIFA_World_Cup_disciplinary_record
    11 - Miralem_Sulejmani
    10 - Laguna_State_Polytechnic_University
    10 - Classified_information
    10 - Skin_Hunters
    9 - Lake_Holiday,_Virginia
    7 - Exxaro


Talk

    23 - Contact_fuze
    17 - Hurricane_Karl_(2010)
    15 - Sexually_transmitted_disease
    14 - Corvette
    14 - Skin_Hunters
    10 - Chili_con_carne
    9 - Harvey's_Dream
    8 - Libyan_civil_war
    8 - Kartvelian_languages
    8 - Windscreen_wiper


User

    28 - Dpmuk/TemplateSandbox
    19 - Dpmuk/Sandbox
    11 - Dpmuk/SchoolNotice
    10 - Dpmuk/Slovaks_in_Hungary_discussion
    9 - Dpmuk
    7 - CorenSearchBot/exclude
    6 - Dpmuk/TemplateSandbox2
    3 - Nuujinn/Slovaks_in_Hungary
    2 - TTquaternary
    2 - Catanzaro


User talk

    134 - Moonriddengirl
    67 - Dpmuk
    23 - JaGa
    16 - Fastily
    15 - Harej
    15 - VernoWhitney
    13 - Eliko
    12 - Sarah777
    10 - JzG
    10 - Anthony_Appleyard/2011/January-March


Wikipedia

    173 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
    45 - Requested_moves
    15 - Contributor_copyright_investigations/Vanished_6551...
    13 - Sockpuppet_investigations/Tobias_Conradi
    10 - Administrators'_noticeboard
    9 - Editor_assistance/Requests
    7 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism
    7 - Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_February_2
    7 - Requests_for_comment/Sarah777_2
    6 - Articles_for_deletion/Walter_J._West


Wikipedia talk

    33 - Requested_moves
    26 - Protection_policy
    13 - Copyrights
    10 - Naming_conventions_(capitalization)
    7 - Copyright_problems
    7 - WikiProject_International_relations
    6 - Userfication
    6 - WikiProject_Copyright_Cleanup
    5 - Copying_within_Wikipedia
    5 - Criteria_for_speedy_deletion


File

    2 - Antpius.jpg
    2 - TAGAirlines.jpg
    1 - Volusian1.jpg
    1 - Trajan_decius.jpg
    1 - Plautilla.jpg
    1 - Old-gmpte-logo.png
    1 - Julia_mamaea.jpg
    1 - Henry_VI_Groat.jpg
    1 - Richard_III_Penny.jpg
    1 - George_II_coin.jpg


File talk

    1 - Portrait_of_Edward_James.jpg
    1 - Toronto_Subway_Train_Type_H2_Interior.jpg


MediaWiki talk

    1 - Wikimedia-copyrightwarning


Template

    4 - AFC_submission/misplaced
    3 - UK_motorways
    3 - Copyviocore
    3 - Bishops_of_Limerick,_Ardfert_and_Aghadoe
    2 - Uw-speedy1
    2 - Admin_backlog/doc
    2 - Move-multi/doc
    2 - RMassist
    2 - Centralized_discussion
    2 - Colchester


Template talk

    14 - Cv-unsure
    2 - Copyviocore
    1 - Db-meta
    1 - Bus_companies_in_England
    1 - Bishops_of_Limerick,_Ardfert_and_Aghadoe
    1 - Christian_Mysticism
    1 - MLB
    1 - LDS_Temple/Cebu_City_Philippines_Temple
    1 - Infobox_station


Category

    2 - Copied_and_pasted_articles_and_sections_with_url_p...
    2 - Copied_and_pasted_articles_and_sections
    1 - Professional_wrestling_trainers
    1 - Executions_at_the_Tower_of_London


Category talk

    1 - Great_Backlog_Drive_2010
    1 - Geography_of_the_Sakha_Republic


Portal

    1 - Contents/Portals/Culture_and_the_arts
    1 - Current_events/2005_May_11



Answers to StephenBuxton's optional question

  1. A tory liar
    This is not a valid R3 as it has been around for two years and R3 requires it to have been recently created. I would however delete as a G10. Although this title is strictly true as he was a member of the Conservative, or Tory, party and he has been found guilty of perjury, hence a liar, I still see several problems with this redirect. I think my biggest problem with it is that it implies we are somehow making a judgement call that he is the most important "tory liar" and in doing so we violate NPOV as we have no evidence for that. There is also the problem that a redirect like this does not provide a balanced, NPOV as it is quite possible someone will find and follow the redirect and not actually read the article and so make the connection between tory liar and Archer without any context or opposing views. I would check what links here to make sure the redirect hadn't been used but other than that, as the user is already blocked, there would be little follow up.
  2. Deben High School
    Not a valid A7 as schools are specifically excluded from A7 and even without that, given the precedence AfD, just being a high school is a sign of possible (indeed probable) notability. The first thing I'd probably do is a google search to try to find out more about the school, mainly where it is and what name the school itself uses so that I could attempt to see if we already have an article on the school under a slightly different name. If I found such a page I'd redirect and leave the user a note. If not and I'd found out where the school was I'd wikilink the relevant text and keep the page watchlisted for a bit as it had only recently been edited and they might expand it. If that had not been done after a day or so I would consider redirecting to the town / school district or somewhere similar if such an article mentioned the school as in it's current state the article provides no more information. If on the other hand I had not been able to identify the school they were referring to I'd drop the user a note and keep my eye on the article with an eye to A1ing it if nothing was added to it in a reasonable amount of time.
  3. Malcom Hardee
    Definite G10 in my opinion. Even in the unlikely event that he really did "ram a firework up his butt and set fire to it and run around naked" the way it's been worded makes it an attack. It would also be a valid A7 so even without that sentence I would still delete (I can expand on what I'd do in this case if required). I'd look at the user's other contributions and if there were none or the others were clearly good faith I'd explain to the user a bit more why it was unacceptable - it's clearly not appropriate to me but this may be less obvious to some, e.g. a teenager. If there were more attack like or otherwise problematic edits in their history then a block would be in order.
  4. New article
    I don't think this is vandalism as I'd assume good faith and assume they were either testing or were not aware how Wikipedia worked. As such I'd delete under A3 (G2 is also valid). I'd then drop the user that created the page a note saying the I didn't find the edit vandalism, let them know that their free to remove stuff from their talk page and give them a welcome message. I'd then let the tagger know that I personally didn't find the edit vandalism and explain why.
  5. Wizzy Wig the Clown
    Definitely not an A7 in my opinion. The claims to having appeared on television etc are enough signs of possible notability to get above the A7 bar. I'd do a search myself and see if I could find any references if not I'd tag as a BLPPROD and if I could I'd add a reference or two and add a stub tag. I'd drop the creator a message about possible conflict of interest and leave the tagger a message as to why I didn't find it an A7.
  6. Athur the Great
    Well I'd delete as an A7. As the user appears to be a child and they've revealed personal information I'd also inform over sight. I'd then probably post a message at ANI asking someone to post a message to the user as I'll admit this isn't a situation I've come across and so would be unsure how to write such a message. In most cases if I were unsure how to follow through I'd leave it to another admin in the first place but in this instance, given the circumstances, it's more important it was dealt with quickly.
  7. Sudar Barash
    I'd pass on dealing with this one as there is some information there that could be signs of notability (the nine digits comment and the size of the showroom) but I don't know enough on the topic to know if these are run of the mill figures or highly impressive. As such I'd probably leave the whole issue for another admin to deal with so the user was dealing with fewer people but I do note that there are user name and conflict of interest concerns as well.

Dpmuk (talk) 18:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]