Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/WebAPP

Has anyone read this:
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion: Before listing an article for deletion here, consider whether a more efficient alternative is appropriate: For problems that do not require deletion, including duplicate articles, articles needing improvement, pages needing redirects, or POV problems, be bold and fix the problem or tag the article appropriately. If an article is a copyright violation, please list it at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Some articles may qualify for speedy deletion; please refer to the Speedy Deletion criteria and process. For non-controversial deletions, please refer to the Proposed Deletion process.

I am in great doubt that anyone did, because I can not see that Wikipedia suggested delete listing routine has been followed at all. 3 articles were deleted without any attempt being made for improving the article. I see sysops who do not know about open source cms taking impulsive decisions led by "it looks like", "it feels like" etc.., this is tragic. It actually worths an article for itself! Monty53 10:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)