User talk:Zoee.q

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm 47.227.95.73. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fahad Ishmail have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 17:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Kedman (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Zoee.q! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please review the guidlines at WP:NFOOTY and WP:FPL.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 10:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Kedman

Information icon Please do not remove declinature notices as you did with this edit (which also restored several errors previously corrected). These form part of the reveiw history and provide context for susbsequent reviewers. Please do not create duplicate submissions as this can cause confusion and duplication of work and thus take up the time of other volunteers.

With regard to Kedman himself, please read WP:NFOOTY as previously noted. Unless he has played in a fully professional league (see that page for more information) or in a top-level international he will not pass the notability guidelines and an article cannot exist. You might also be interested in Template:Infobox football biography which is more appropriate and I would recommend finding articles on similar subjects to see how they are laid out and structured. You could also look at the guide to article creation and the manual of stlye. Eagleash (talk) 11:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No improvement over previous submissions. There is little if any, point in resubmitting without improvement. The draft does not indicate that the player can pass the notability guidelines; if it is submitted again without significant development it may be subject to rejection (as against decline for improvement) and may even be nominated for deletion. Advice in respect of notability has previously been left.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 16:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Zoee.q/sandbox

Hello, Zoee.q. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! さしゃ せべん (たるこ) 16:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Kedman

Hello, Zoee.q. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Kedman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Zoee.q"