User talk:Ziphon
 | Ziphon is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia hopefully from July onwards when I have more time |
El Taco Tote
DO NOT Delete El Taco Tote Mexican Sponge (talk) 02:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Morim.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:R129415 426219.jpg. The copy called Image:R129415 426219.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 07:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
June 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page Template:Welcome0, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. Lwarf Talk to Me! 11:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Don't worry, just try not to let that happen again and if you need a space to test coding try the Sand Box --Lwarf Talk to Me! 11:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: wikipedia logo with spinning star
Add this line to your userpage:
<span style="position:absolute;top:-50px;left:-175px;z-index:-1">[[Image:Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif|180px]]</span>
Have fun!-- Vintei talk 13:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Medicine!
Welcome to WikiProject Medicine!
I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Our goal is to facilitate collaboration on medicine-related articles, and everyone is welcome to join (regardless of medical qualifications!). Here are some suggested activities:
- Read our Manual of Style for medical articles
- Join in editing our collaboration of the week (the current one is Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
- Discuss with other members in the doctor's mess
- Have a look at some related WikiProjects
- Have a look at the collaboration dashboard
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.
Again, welcome! --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 08:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Well done for the hard work on osteoporosis. With a bit more work, this could be a good article at some point. JFW | T@lk 09:53, 11 May 2008(UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ziphon! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. PS2pcGAMER (talk) 09:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
I've granted you the rollback tool, as per request. Please be careful how you use it. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 05:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Star Trek Trivia
I personally think that Trivia sections are Informative and Entertaining as well and was not happy to find out that they are not part of Wiki Policy anymore (Used to love going to movie pages just for the Trivia Sections). I am just trying to work on the Star Trek Articles to get them to a point where they meet the guidelines (A long and windy road awaits me.) I have tried to keep items that relate the the show/episode as a full in there and any ideas you have would be great. Even if we can incorporate them into the actuall article. Take it easy anyways and sorry if this has been a pain. MattyC3350 (talk) 13:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Using Twinkle in a content dispute
Hi, you should not be using Twinkle to revert during a content dispute, especially using the vandalism button. It is not helpful in resolving the dispute. Kevin (talk) 04:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
My bad. I was annoyed that the reader completely ignored my message I put on his talk page and simply reverted my edit without dealing with my concerns. Ziphon (ALLears) 08:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Third opinion about Sheikh Abdullah
Hello. I saw your 3rd opinion request and posted a note on Alexis49's talk page. I also moved the quote to the the article's talk page and mentioned there that I do not feel the quote belongs at the top of the article, along with my reasoning. I see a couple of other users have also offered 3rd opinions on Alexis49's talk page, so I went ahead and removed the third opinion request from the list of open requests at WP:3O. If you still need asistance, or if you feel additional opinions are warranted, feel free to replace the request. Thanks. AubreyEllenShomo (talk) 05:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Ziphon (ALLears) 08:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Internet Diplomacy
Hello. I saw your earlier posts in the discussion page of Internet Diplomacy. PLAYdiplomacy and phpdiplomacy have solved the past issue with my mediation, but now I am afraid we might be getting dangerously close to yet another edit war after a post from the site owner of 'Internet Diplomacy' calling the rest of the people's opinions (not edits, just discussion) on his article biased and threatening to revert any changes regarding his article. Can you take a look at it? Babutsa123 (talk) 10:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
MCOTW
JFW | T@lk 10:18, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Response from Babutsa123 about Internet Diplomacy
I'm not too familiar with Wikipedia policy but I think considering what is best for Diplomacy itself, and the fact that the article is about Internet Diplomacy, which is at a development stage and can pretty much only be carried through these websites, I'm against deleting the list of websites.
We should most certainly establish a standard though. I think if a site exists, it deserves mention of its name, with the link to it as citation. This establishes that we should have a listing of the sites, and perhaps their maps. I don't think an Internet Diplomacy article which does not direct visitors to the actual diplomacy on internet is a good idea.
I also think it is reasonable to mention the unique features they have, but only after they've been proven to an independent observer, and preferably with links on the site which shows that they actually are there.
I think there should be an emphasis on 'independent observers' having more control than stakeholders such as a site owners. I was just checking the talk for Internet Diplomacy, and I'm rather bothered by the fact that the owner of the site in development named 'Internet Diplomacy' calls me subjective and says I have a hidden agenda (Ironically, while he is defending a site he owns..) and says he will block any attempts to alter the section about it. This is the worst case of notability since there's no actual site, and no proof other than a todo list I could create in MS word in 2 minutes, yet it takes half the page with priority over sections with notable sources.
Since you know more about Wikipedia policy, I think we should work on establishing a standard for Internet Diplomacy and applying it to all websites together. Then it will be possible to weed out problems created by stubborn site owners subjectively defending their sections.
Babutsa123 (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Ascending cholangitis
It has passed GA! Well done for all your work on this article. JFW | T@lk 21:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ziphon!
Congratulations on ascending cholangitis passing GA-nomination. I have included a few sources for the Lymphatic system on its talk page. It's proving very difficult to get the right kind of sources, so the ones I have added might not be the most pertinent.
Hope you find the sources useful.
Regards.
—KetanPanchaltaLK 15:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi! I've added a few more sources, particularly on history on the talk page of the article. —KetanPanchaltaLK 12:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
MCOTW
JFW | T@lk 21:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Asthma FAR
Asthma has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
DYK for impingement syndrome
|
On 7 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article impingement syndrome, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYKBot (talk) 16:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Your Survey
Hi EyeMD
I'm writing an article for the Uni of Melb medical student society newsletter about wikipedia and its role in the medical course and am planning to interview some WP:MED contributors about their views about role of wikipedia in medicine and general views about wikipedia.
Basically if your happy to help me, i'll send you a questionairre of about 5 questions for you to complete. It won't take too long to complete; probably 10-15min.
Thanks Ziphon
- Hi Ziphon, I got your message - please send the survey by email. Thanks, EyeMD T|C 20:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Avatar roll call
The Avatar: The Last Airbender task force is having a roll call. Please add yourself to the list via this link if you intend to still be active with the project.
Cheers, NuclearWarfare (Talk) 21:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
|
Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!) |
-- Addbot (talk) 00:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 12:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
MCOTW time
JFW | T@lk 16:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Dan Santos
Hello,
I would like to kindly enquire as to why my recently created 'Dan Santos' page has been removed, or in your Wikipedian vernacular, 'speedily deleted'. Lord Santos and I have a profound friendship, and I created this page out of utter respect for him. In turn, I am quite insulted that you have interpreted my creation in honour of him as a personal attack, especially without any supporting evidence. You of all people should know you should not attach arbitrary labels without citations.
Hopefully I have convinced you to reverse the damage you have done not only to Dan Santos's reputation, but to the Wikipedia community.
Yours sincerely,
Dan Santos's friend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jchae88 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Your opinion is wanted
Please provide your input here on the legitimacy and desirability of accepting external links in relevant Wikipedia articles to MedMerits, a new and freely accessible online resource on neurologic disorders. Presto54 (talk) 02:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiMedicine
Hi
I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.
Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.
Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 06:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in meta:Wikimedia Medicine. We hope to create a non profit corporation to promote the aims of the Wikimedia Movement within the topic domain of medicine. This means we plan to promote the creation and release of "health care information in all languages" under an open license. This will be done primarily via speaking and collaborating with both individuals and organizations who share our goal. We are working on anumber of collaborations already and are open to more ideas. Documents of incorporation have been submitted and we hope to be officially "off the ground" by mid Dec 2012.
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
 | The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Research tools and services Outreach Get involved  ...Support Open Access...  |
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.
- Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
- Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
- If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.
The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.
BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors
Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Medical Translation Newsletter
Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce
This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice.
note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject MedicineSpotlight - Simplified article translation
Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.
Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
- WHO's list of Essential Medicines[1]
- Neglected tropical diseases[2]
- Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.
We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.
What's happening?
- IEG grant
I've (CFCF) taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
- Wikimania 2014
For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
- Integration progress
There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish.
What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
- Swedish
Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that.
Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May. - Dutch
Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie. - Polish
Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article.
(This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration - Arabic
The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.
- Integration guides
Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here [3]
News in short
- To come
- Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
- Proofreading drives
- Further reading
- Translators Without Borders
- Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign
 |
Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of the Medical Translation Newsletter, please add your name to the subscriber's list. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, CFCF (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Medicine/Translation Taskforce/Newsletter/Suggestions.
Want to help out manage the newsletter? Get in touch with me CFCF (talk · contribs)
For the newsletter from Wikiproject Medicine, see The Pulse
If you are receiving this newsletter without having signed up, it is because you have signed up as a member of the Translation Taskforce, or Wiki Project Med on meta. 22:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Medical Translation Newsletter Aug./Sept. 2014
Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 2, Aug./Sept. 2014
by CFCF
Feature – Ebola articles
During August we have translated Disease and it is now live in more than 60 different languages! To help us focus on African languages Rubric has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and Ian Henderson from Rubric who's joined us here at Wikipedia. We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!
- Just some of our over 60 translations:
- New roles and guides!
At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our home-page!
- New sign up page!
We're proud to announce a new sign up page at WP:MTSIGNUP! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed!
- Style guides for translations
Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to good article nominations, but only for ledes.
- Some more stats
- In July, 18 full article translations went live (WP:RTT), and an additional 6 simplified versions went live (WP:RTTS)!
- We have a number of new lead integrators into Dutch, Polish, Arabic and Bulgarian, with more to come in smaller languages! (Find them here old sign up page)
- We were mentioned in a Global Voices Online report by Subhashish Panigrahi at Doctors and translators are working together to bridge Wikipedia's medical language gap
- New medical professionals have started, dedicated to working in Odiya and Kinyarwanda!
- Further reading
- Translators Without Borders
- Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign
-- CFCF 🍌 (email) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Signpost exit poll
Dear Wikipedian, you recently voted in the ArbCom election. Your username, along with around 155 other usernames of your fellow Wikipedians, was randomly selected from the 2000+ Wikipedians who voted this year, with the help of one of the election-commissioners. If you are willing, could you please participate (at your option either on-wiki via userspace or off-wiki via email) in an exit poll, and answer some questions about how you decided amongst the ArbCom candidates?
If you decide to participate in this exit poll, the statistical results will be published in the Signpost, an online newspaper with over 1000 Wikipedians among the readership. There are about twelve questions, which have alphanumerical answers; it should take you a few minutes to complete the exit poll questionnaire, and will help improve Wikipedia by giving future candidates information about what you think is important. This is only an unofficial survey, and will have no impact on your actual vote during this election, nor in any future election.
All questions are individually optional, and this entire exit poll itself is also entirely optional, though if you choose not to participate, I would appreciate a brief reply indicating why you decided not to take part (see Question Zero). Thanks for being a Wikipedian
The questionnaire
Dear Wikipedian, please fill out these questions -- at your option via usertalk or via email, see Detailed Instructions at the end of the twelve questions -- by putting the appropriate answer in the blanks provided. If you decide not to answer a question (all questions are optional), please put the reason down: "undecided" / "private information" / "prefer not to answer" / "question is not well-posed" / "other: please specify". Although the Signpost cannot guarantee that complex answers can be processed for publication, it will help us improve future exit polls, if you give us comments about why you could not answer specific questions.
quick and easy exit poll , estimated time required: 4 minutes
|
|---|
|
|
Detailed Instructions: you are welcome to answer these questions via usertalk (easiest), or via email (for a modicum of privacy).
how to submit your answers , estimated time required: 2 minutes
|
|---|
Processing of responses will be performed in batches of ten, prior to publication in the Signpost. GamerPro64 will be processing the email-based answers, and will strive to maintain the privacy of your answers (as well as your email address and the associated IP address typically found in the email-headers), though of course as a volunteer effort, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will have a system free from computer virii, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will resist hypothetical bribes offered by the KGB/NSA/MI6 to reveal your secrets, and we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will make no mistakes. If you choose to answer on-wiki, your answers will be visible to other Wikipedians. If you choose to answer via email, your answers will be sent unencrypted over the internet, and we will do our best to protect your privacy, but unencrypted email is inherently an improper mechanism for doing so. Sorry! :-) |
We do promise to try hard, not to make any mistakes, in the processing and presentation of your answers. If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact column-editor GamerPro64, copy-editor 75.108.94.227, or copy-editor Ryk72. Thanks for reading, and thanks for helping Wikipedia. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 14:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Ziphon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Membership renewal
You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2020.
| ReJoin Wiki Project Med Foundation |
|---|
Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Membership renewal of Wiki Project Med Foundation
Membership renewal
You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2022.
| ReJoin Wiki Project Med Foundation |
|---|
Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk), 2021.01