User talk:Zidi-jattt
Welcome
Hi Zidi-jattt! welcome to Wikipedia!
Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.
|
Here are some links that you might find useful:
|
You can contribute in many ways
|
I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. You can also type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! utcursch | talk 09:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User talk:Information-Line has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. [Belinrahs | 'sup? | what'd I do?] 18:02, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Pk5abi. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) 18:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Information-Line, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sikh-History 19:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Punjabi language. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. utcursch | talk 09:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Information-Line. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sikh-History 13:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Gujjar. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sikh-History 13:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Aqwis (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Final warning on unconstructive, unexplained reverts
In this edit you reverted an edit which I explained was incorrect "Removes: 1) Redlink names with no reference. 2) Links to Wiki articles that have been nominated for deletion. (If and when they are proved notable, they can be added here." [1]
You gave no reason for your revert. Wikipedia is not for promotion or essays. But especially it is not the place to include material about anybody who wants some publicity. They must be notable. Please read [2].
In this edit you removed four languages from the list without explanation: [3].
This is a final warning, Wikipedia does not allow editors to change anything they disagree with without explanation. It is not a political battlefield. If remove more apparently valid information without explanation, or revert an edit that removed incorrect information without explanation, you will be blocked from editing. Piano non troppo (talk) 21:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)