User talk:Zeke72791

Edit to Eva Longoria

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from an article. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please discuss your edit. None of it was repetitive. Ronbo76 02:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was repetitive. In one paragraph it states, "Longoria continues to be included in lists of Hollywood's Most Beautiful, and was listed as #1 in Maxim's Hottest Female Stars of 2005 and 2006, becoming the first woman to top the list in two consecutive years." Then later on, it states again, "In May 2006 Maxim magazine named Longoria number 1 on the Hot 100 list for 2006." So I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't be so snooty about it. I'm just trying to help edit a poorly-writted article where stuff was just obviously placed at the end of paragraphs over and over. Zeke72791 03:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second edit to Eva Longoria

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. It may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not delete cited material on an article unless you have reached consensus on the article talkpage. Ronbo76 02:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:ColumbiaEagle.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaEagle.JPG. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under "fair use". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.)

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 23:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fritz.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Fritz.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Early Show. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. MegastarLV (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]