User talk:Zad68/Archive 2015 Sep

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia

News and notes: Flow placed on ice

Discussion report: WMF's sudden reversal on Wiki Loves Monuments

Featured content: Brawny

In the media: Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage

Traffic report: You didn't miss much

Technology report: Tech news in brief

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Please reconsider and rescind your limitations on new users for the Gamergate article

I've been looking this over and it seems the article is full of controversy and hyperbole. Your sanctions have not helped. In fact, it looks like the proper course of action would've been to topic ban TheRedPenofDoom at that time (which was who the initial complaint was about), instead of chasing away new users, which is the effect of your actions. TheRedPenofDoom was eventually topic-banned, but your sanction against ALL new users remains.

I've been looking into the rules for enforcement and your sanction is not actually allowed by the rules. With regard to page protection, full and semi-protection are the only remedies allowed to you. Furthermore, the sanction pages specifically state that such sanctions should not be used to chase away new users, which is precisely the design and outcome of your sanctions.

Please correct this error. Thank you. Saigo no Yume (talk) 21:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Zad68 hasn't edited since June, so I don't think you'll be able to get an answer out of him. Technically you could appeal his decision at WP:AE, but I'd suggest you don't because I love the 30/500 rule and think it's the best. Instead get a hang of editing in other areas first, before trying to edit the Gamergate page. From what I can gather you really dislike the Gamergate article as it currently stands but trust me, there are far worse and far easier to fix articles out there. Go gain some experience dealing with those ones first, and then come back to Gamergate. It will decrease your chances of getting topic banned by 95% or something. Brustopher (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it's working. The OP is evidence of that. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal ^talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)