User talk:Yash1110

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

May 2022

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. According to the sources provided, he was indeed a Kamboj. Bishonen | tålk 20:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"if he was a kamboj then why he was in 32nd Sikh Pioneers" its a valid reason. Yash1110 (talk) 08:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is your original research. Please click on that link and read. Original research is not allowed in articles, and is not a valid reason; everything must be based on reliable, published sources. I would say this is especially important for caste. The statement that he was a kamboj is sourced to two reliable, published sources. You need to find reliable sources that agree with you if you want to change the article. Bishonen | tålk 08:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]
it may be added further that udham singh's father originally belonged to patiali village of Etah district of uttar pardesh who migrated to punjab in 1880. his father chuhar ram belonged to chamar sub caste but he got converted ti shikhism and adopted the name of Tehal singh. these facts are mentioned in a book titled "Etah Janpad ka itihas" " history of Etah Diatrict written by Sh. Chinatamani Shukla" and quoted by Dr. Rajpal Singh 'Raj' in his book referred to above. this facts is also mentioned in a book titled "Bharat me Samajik Parivartan Ke Prernashort" written by Sh.Mata Parsad Ex Governor of Arunachal Pradesh. Another book titled "Swantarta Sangram ma Achhuton ka Yogdan" written by D.C.Dinker also corroborates these facts. Yash1110 (talk) 08:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I'm not in a position to evaluate the sources you mention. Please mention them at Talk:Udham Singh and get input on their reliability from users who know the area (which I don't - I'm only here as an adminstrator). I advise you to start a new section on the talkpage, with an explanatory title. Don't use the "semi-protected edit request" format, and don't edit the article again without first getting consensus for your change and your sources. Good luck. Bishonen | tålk 10:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Palwankar Shivram, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 22:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you have added this paper to a couple of articles as a reference for the term "Berwa". First of all, this article doesn't seem to have been published in a reliable peer-reviewed journal: a self-published source shouldn't be used as a reference. Secondly, even if the cited article is deemed a reliable source, you should use the term that it uses: "Barwa", not "Berwa". utcursch | talk 22:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Udaiya Chamar (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yash1110! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Ahirwar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Abecedare (talk) 23:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Abecedare (talk) 23:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Control copyright icon Hello Yash1110! Your additions to Sankaravarman have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spamming Talk:Chamar with the same poorly sourced request

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:15, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Chambhar. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chambhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chandal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Posting large blocks of articles in talk pages

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chambhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chandal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. UricdivineTalkToMe 18:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Udaiya Chamar (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs a complete rewrite to make more factual and neutral in tone, as well as clearer and more legible.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Udaiya Chamar (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Martin Urbanec was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article still has issues with neutrality. "Very few people know", "single-handedly took" and similar are not neutral phrases.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Dr.Pinsky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ahirwar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 19:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to a sanction

The following sanction has been imposed on you:

indefinite topic ban from the WP:CASTE topic area. broadly construed. This means that you are not permitted to edit related pages or topics, or discuss these outside of an appeal of this sanction.

You have been sanctioned because you continue to edit war and disrupt these pages. Your talk page is littered with warnings concerning this topic area, but you do not seem to WP:COMMUNICATE that responsively. I recommend that you edit other, less controversial topics for a while without incident prior to appealing. I also recommend you wait at least 6 months before doing so. Note that I was gonna topic ban you from the entire WP:ARBIND topic area, but in the end decided on this more targeted sanction. So hopefully, my erring on the side of leniency there was the right call.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by the community's decision at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups, and the procedure described by the general sanctions guidelines. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that topic. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. El_C 19:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why???? give me a valid reason... Yash1110 (talk) 20:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "valid"? The reasons are outlined in the notice's 2nd paragraph. And seeing as you have continued edit warring in violation of your topic ban, I am blocking you for 2 days. Look, you are free to disagree with the basis for the sanction and to appeal it. But you cannot disregard it unless that appeal succeed and the sanction is, in turn, lifted. Thank you. El_C 01:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I had not started the editing war, its your so callaed bro Mahant Sonty who started the editing war. Yash1110 (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but that does not inspire confidence. There's no such thing as "starting" an edit war, as it's never a solo thing. Beyond that, you can keep deflecting by only narrowly focusing on the latest incident, but if you actually read what I've written, you see I'm referring to wider problems in the topic area involving yourself. El_C 21:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block

To enforce community-authorised general sanctions, and for edit warring in violation of the above topic ban,
you have been blocked from editing for 48 hours. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. El_C 01:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).

  • @El C: Note that I've reset the timer on this block due to obvious logged out evasion via this IP.-- Ponyobons mots 21:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block 2

Another 2 weeks. Next one will be for 2 months, after that, even longer. You are not thinking this through by continuing to willfully ignore the topic ban (without even bothering with an appeal). El_C 17:38, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block 3

Another 2 months. Next one will be for a full year. El_C 11:23, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: Note that I've reset the timer on this block due to obvious logged out evasion via this IP.-- Ponyobons mots 21:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block 4

Now one year. Ponyo if you could keep an eye for further evasion, that'd be appreciated. El_C 06:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: Can you link to the IP account used for evasion this time around? Just trying to re-familiarize myself with their typical behaviour.-- Ponyobons mots 16:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, there was no evasion this time (I was referring to the one above), just another TBAN vio. But it stands to reason that they'll be evading again now. El_C 17:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Collpasing warnings and notices that concern contributions in violation of the WP:CASTE topic ban. El_C 17:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
== Your submission at Articles for creation: Udaiya Chamar (February 1) ==
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Now it's hard to tell where the person fits in the history of the movement. What time period and events was she involved?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
== March 2023 ==

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Sankaravarman. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Udaiya Chamar

Information icon Hello, Yash1110. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Udaiya Chamar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Udaiya Chamar

Hello, Yash1110. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Udaiya Chamar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Yash1110"