User talk:Włodzimierz Lewoniewski (UEP)
Welcome!
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
ISSNs
Hi, I see you're spending a lot of effort adding ISSNs to assorted refs; for some reason a lot of these seem to be on articles I've brought to GA status.
You may like to note that an ISSN identifies not an individual scientific paper, but just the journal it is in. The citations always provide the name of the journal, which of course identifies it uniquely already; and the DOI uniquely identifies the paper, along with its journal and all the other details. The ISSN is at best redundant to these other identifiers, so it's not exactly important. There are literally millions of poorly-developed articles on Wikipedia, and presumably tens of millions of errors and omissions. One might think these rather more deserving of effort than the rather pointless ISSN. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Hiiiii