User talk:Wiserd911
I'm an eLearning Specialist with an undergraduate degree in Biotechnology. My first edit was may 2005.
Welcome!
Hello, Wiserd911, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- GraemeL (talk) 14:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ryan, I noticed some of your edits on Talk:Baldness treatments. You seem to be trying to indent comments using spaces. The Wiki software renders lines that start with white space with no formatting. If you want to indent, start the line with one or more colons (more colons means more indenting) like the ones below (If you edit the page, you will see the colons)...
- Indented.
- Indented more.
- Even more indenting.
- Indented more.
Hope this helps. --GraemeL (talk) 14:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
That's not what I was doing, but thanks. --Ryan Wise 20:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
NCLB
Actually, what I was saying was that the criticism should remain in the section, rather than be thrown into the criticism section. It's more NPOV that way. That's why I left it as a WP:AGF edit. Soxwon (talk) 01:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
November 2010
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nazism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- The Nazis described themsevles as being to the left of the social democrats. There are many sources that describe the Nazis as being on the left. Just because your teacher told you something doesn't make it authoritative fact. I removed a highly NPOV assertion, and you've given no coherant reason whatsoever, outside of your own assertion, why it was not 'constructive.'
--Ryan W (talk) 04:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- It seems from your editing that you have started a campaign to redefine the concepts of the political spectrum contrary to common usage, and that you have applied unsourced personal opinions, unexplained removal of content and usage of non-reliable sources in a number of articles in order to achieve your goal. If you don't want to be blocked for disruptive editing, I would strongly advise you to familiarise yourself with WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:NPOV for starters, and in general try to achieve consensus before making any edits to articles concerning this subject. --Saddhiyama (talk) 10:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- "Common usage" would require equal input from people across the political spectrum as well as input from people in different countries. Further, "Right Wing" in America isn't considered the same as "Right Wing" in Europe. Edits were sourced. If you look at my comments on the talk page I did try to achieve consensus once there was conflict. Further, your claim that this was my personal doing demonstrates an unfamiliarity with the material in question. Read through it and the archives, you'll see that numerous people found the definitions controversial. --Ryan W (talk) 04:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- It seems from your editing that you have started a campaign to redefine the concepts of the political spectrum contrary to common usage, and that you have applied unsourced personal opinions, unexplained removal of content and usage of non-reliable sources in a number of articles in order to achieve your goal. If you don't want to be blocked for disruptive editing, I would strongly advise you to familiarise yourself with WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:NPOV for starters, and in general try to achieve consensus before making any edits to articles concerning this subject. --Saddhiyama (talk) 10:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)