User talk:Wickster12345
| This is Wickster12345's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: AHL participation at the Spengler Cup has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Kreis (August 28)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georg Kreis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Wickster12345!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard 🗨 12:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
|
Disambiguation link notification for September 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AHL participation at the Spengler Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canada national hockey team. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Profusa (September 3)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Profusa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
CS1 error on Genocide
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Genocide, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Kreis has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Superboilles (talk) 19:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: David Lombardi (November 5)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Lombardi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Profusa (November 5)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Profusa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Wickster12345. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is hilarious. You assume because I’ve written a detailed article about a company I must have a personal association. I have no personal or professional affiliation with Profusa. Wickster12345 (talk) 17:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing hilarious about it. I asked a question. It only requires an answer. (And BTW, I didn't ask a question about any specific company, eg. Profusa, you're the one who brought that up.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- It was clear what you were referring to. But yes now I answered it. I still think it’s hilarious, but maybe that’a just a personal opinion. I guess I should refrain from expressing that something’s hilarious on Wikipedia, lots of neuroatypical people here, but I digress Wickster12345 (talk) 18:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing hilarious about it. I asked a question. It only requires an answer. (And BTW, I didn't ask a question about any specific company, eg. Profusa, you're the one who brought that up.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Profusa has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacha Wigdorovits has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Superboilles (talk) 08:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: HBM Healthcare Investments has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Superboilles (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Secularism
When I said "Calm down", it just seemed to me that you were upset when you said "you’re basically insinuating Wikipedia should have a moralizing and officially secular role". I don't know what your personal beliefs are but it seemed to me that this was upsetting for you. It often helps discussions to focus on the content and not the editor. It's not a good idea to say editors are "insinuating" something because they don't have problems openly stating their positions. I was simply referring to the fact, that you are still disputing, that Hamas is widely considered a terrorist organization by academic sources. We have invented definitions of terrorism just to explain Hamas and fund our response to Hamas and Islamist terrorism. This is the view that prevails. The only significant opposition comes from religious countries with Islamist governments. If Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey designated this organization a terrorist organization, I have little doubt that the UN, Norway and China would drop their opposition, as it is not a defensible or reasonable position after October 7 massacres and they are clawing at thin ice as it is. Ben Azura (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- I never disputed Hamas is considered terrorist by most academics. I just think the academic view should be provided alongside the view of countries that have taken a position on Hamas. The reason I think why country positions should be included has nothing to do with whether I agree with the merit or value of specific governments’ views. It is simply for informational purposes. It doesn’t mean I agree with the Iranian government, I simply think together with academic views, the views of non-Islamic governments, it is ok to also provide cited explanations of the views of pro-Hamas governments. I personally value the reader’s right to receive all the information more than not mentioning views we think are harmful and Islamist, because this is an encyclopedia for everyone, not just people in the west or secular people. Wickster12345 (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Profusa (February 11)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Profusa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- How not? Wickster12345 (talk) 07:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)