User talk:WestonH233

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hancock Aortic Tissue Valve (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KeepItGoingForward were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KeepItGoingForward (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, JustinB334! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KeepItGoingForward (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hancock Aortic Tissue Valve (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KeepItGoingForward was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KeepItGoingForward (talk) 07:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hancock Aortic Tissue Valve has been accepted

Hancock Aortic Tissue Valve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KeepItGoingForward (talk) 08:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I upgraded my assessment to start class. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 08:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

I noticed that you've been editing some health-related articles recently. A bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. It's a good place to ask questions about good sources for medical content and appropriate writing style. Please consider putting the page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hancock Jaffe Laboratories, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hancock Jaffe Laboratories moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hancock Jaffe Laboratories. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ASUKITE 18:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asukite I am also concerned that the @JustinB334 has a strong COI, as everything they have created and edited is connected to them. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 19:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Information icon Hello, JustinB334. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Hancock Jaffe Laboratories, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Per above, I am formally asking you if you have a conflict of interest with "Hancock Jaffe Laboratories" or any affiliation which may impact the neutrality of your submissions. ASUKITE 18:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hancock Jaffe Laboratories (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hancock Jaffe Laboratories has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hancock Jaffe Laboratories. Thanks! KeepItGoingForward (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Hancock moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Warren Hancock. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 16:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:WestonH233, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WestonH233|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. S0091 (talk) 16:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Cody Ko. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is still active discussion at Talk:Cody Ko about whether to include that information about Ko and whether there are adequate sources. Please do not add the information until consensus is reached.C.Fred (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]