User talk:Wdallen49

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobbie R. Allen (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While potentially WP:N this needs more WP:RS and WP:SECONDARY for verification. Article is sourced almost entirely to WP:PRIMARY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bobbie R. Allen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 03:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wdallen49! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 03:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chetsford and rules on talk pages

I just reverted an edit by an IP on User talk:Chetsford per WP:REFACTOR. If this was you, you were logged out and you are not allowed to change even your comments on another talk page. Instead, we prefer that you strike-out comments you wish to withdraw. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was me, I was on my cell phone making the edits. Sorry, didn't realize that was out of line. Wdallen49 (talk) 00:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobbie R. Allen (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia cannot rely on self-published sources. Too many primary sources is also a problem. It would be better for you seek publishing this account in a magazine related to aviation, Texas, or the Federal Government.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bobbie R. Allen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 00:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobbie R. Allen has been accepted

Bobbie R. Allen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 12:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, Wdallen49. I noticed that your recent edit to Bobbie R. Allen added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 07:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been authorized via email, by Barbara Dunn, President of the International Society of Air Safety Investigators to utilize the subject photograph. Can you please reinstate the subject photograph? Copyright information on the photograph may reflect authorization by ISASI organization however, photographer is unknown.