User talk:Wasell
It was noted years ago on the talk page that the article has a decidedly Leninist bent, with talk of "bourgeoisie" and "petit-bourgeois" and that bent is still there. That was my concern with the article. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 04:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Capital of Ukraine
Hi, I wonder why? The self-name is Kyiv, it's pronounced like Kyiv as well. What's the reason to use old Soviet-Russian name instead of an official one? Thanks. --Goo3 (talk) 17:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Your change in "Dream speech" article
Hi, Wasell. You undid a change I made, restoring "censured" where I had corrected the word, as I thought, to "censored." You commented "That makes no sense." Please explain: how does censuring (i.e.,, disapproving, criticizing) make sense in this context? Is "censured" really the word that fits here? Thanks. Cognita (talk) 02:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Replied on User talk:Cognita. —Wasell(T) 10:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Wasell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi
I'm NTS. You have been reverting my edits and I think that we should fix that. I got my iPad account blocked, and I'm forced to use a phone for 6 months. I had good faith and great resources, so I don't really understand why you are doing this exactly. Hopefully, we can settle this. I'll edit Chuck Jones Tom and Jerry shorts, and until spring, I'll remain there. Have a nice evening, and I hope you understand. -NTS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:4001:1AA0:446E:A433:A57A:EA72 (talk) 01:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- There are a number of problems here:
- It's extremely obvious that you are Ritvik12. According to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ritvik12/Archive you have been socking enough to be regarded as banned per WP:3X.
- You're block-evading right now. When you were blocked as 73.135.4.140, that meant that you, the person, were blocked -- not just the particular device you were using.
- Your editing is very problematic: You're going against the manual of style in almost every way imaginable. You're not using reliable sources. You're edit warring.
- What you should do:
- Stop editing Wikipedia.
- Contact WP:UTRS and ask to be unblocked.
- That's really all there is to it. —Wasell(T) 08:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Hlo!!!
Hey !!! I'm Tanisha . So I'm a new user at wiki. And I'm trying to be a part of here by editing some articles with just more informations. But you have been reverting my edits ,that I have done on "Auxins". So is there anything wrong on my edit , so that you are forced to revert mine ??? I just wanna know, why you reverted that one ? Tanisha priyadarshini (talk) 16:26, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wasell:, I was just going through contributions of Tanisha priyadarshini and saw that she has added a message here. Just wanted to tell you that I had reverted your edit on Auxin and later found that you had already reverted the wrong edit done by Tanisha priyadarshini. My error!
Tanisha priyadarshini, Wikipedia has layout rules which you need to follow. Regards - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 02:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Ohhh then I'm really sry Wasell ..... I had thought that u had reverted it . Tanisha priyadarshini (talk) 11:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
removal of content on user talk:Kermitmailbox99
I see you removed two large pieces of content on User talk:Kermitmailbox99. Were you aware that this was a second chance attempt by the user thus should be kept so admin's can review it as part of his unblock process? Tknifton (talk) 21:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, crap! No, I did not see that. Very sorry, I acted much too quickly. —Wasell(T) 04:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Reverting edits
Hi Wasell, please be careful and check before you revert other people's edits. In your reversion to List of Indian folk dances, you reverted the change from "center" to "centre", the latter being the most commonly used variant in India, which typically follows British English spelling conventions. Both British and American spelllings are acceptable on Wikipedia; please read WP:ENGVAR for full guidance on what is and isn't acceptable concerning national varieties of English. Thank you. Baffle☿gab 19:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The intellectual disability editing is reverted
Can somebody please clarify why my editing was classified not global and reverted? I feel condemned, embarrassed and objectified when my edits get reverted with improper explanation or without (enough) explanation for being reverted to begin with. People don't know it's harder than one thinks for seeing and finding other countries' references to intellectual disability, not to mention not just any references can be used and there's controversy over the terms relating to intellectual disability. How can anyone, let alone I, be constructive or a good editor on Wikipedia content sites while everybody else feels my changes may be substandard, not proper or questionable? Angela Kate Maureen Pears 09:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this is the area I need to contact you. There was a whole section removed and it took me about a week to gather that info plus references & cites, only to have it remove.
I want to get better at being a contributor. So if you can let me know what I'm doing wrong so I may fix it, that will help me in not making that mistake again.
For instance, were his daughters name is, one of the names is spelled wrong, I corrected it and it was reversed back. His wife cite info is not there any longer and none of the Production Discography from 1990-2022 all removed.
I do not know him personally, so the time and effort I put into searching the net for this was time consuming. I always initial my work, so if I misquoted any writings of any entertainer that can reach out to correct me.
If you will help to be better a wiki updating I would appreciate it.
I'm presently in the usa, central time zone. I will check back around 12:00 pm noon. If all possible I would like to speak with you to get a better tone of what I need to do to become better at updating wikie pages, because I have another page I would like restored "two kings and a cypher".
In October 2022, I will have another update for Mr. Ron Lawrence through a representative at Howard University. Thank you.... please help/ assist. SSP-TPP (talk) 06:06, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply
I was removing overly-promotional things, that was why 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 18:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thank you ...
 |
... for a constructive comment in the Laurence Olivier RfC, to which I referred in my arbcand questions. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Achaudhary0205 continues to make ungrammatical edits and modify quotes, does not reply to talk page. Thank you. —DIYeditor (talk) 02:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Trade mark is copyright of the holder
Trade mark is the copyright of the holder and public information. Opcouk (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Your revert on Kepler-1229b
In this edit [[1]], you reverted a discovery date change from 2011, back to 2016. I wish you had looked at the talk page. I tried to investigate the actual discovery date, but didn't get very far. All I know is that the planet was mentioned in 2013, so 2016 appears to be the wrong date. But I couldn't confirm an actual date in 2011. Dhrm77 (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
I want to encourage reconsidering the revert on what I wrote about Penguin Random House
Penguin and Random House were, individually, publishers with about a century of publishing history. Without the addition of their history prior to the merger, the public may not be able to know the two publishers in a historical context. I want to ask if the items can be returned to the article, and the revert cancelled. Starlighsky (talk) 15:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Answered on your talk page. —Wasell(T) 🌻🇺🇦 15:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Fix a Grammar
I was fix the grammar the article but you just recent 2 contributions rollback. Next time, I will add summary. 47.234.198.142 (talk) 15:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Regarding your revert on edit war's talk page
I thought we were allowed to edit other people's posts for formatting changes? Is that not true? Tusharhero (talk) 00:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- See WP:TPO:
—Wasell(T) 04:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC)It is not necessary to bring talk pages to publishing standards, so there is no need to copy edit others' posts. Doing so can be irritating. The basic rule, with exceptions outlined below, is to not edit or delete others' posts without their permission.
using em instead of bold
For my cecotrope edits, thanks for showing the link that explains the use of bold. There's so much to learn. I want to emphasize some words & it says to not use bold but rather to use <em>...</em> so I was going to add that to the words that used to have bold. Just wanted to check with you to see if that is the correct way to do it. This would be done on about 5 words in the article. Sunandshade (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)