User talk:VoldemortRams

Welcome!

Hello, VoldemortRams, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Thekambattu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Phileasson (talk) 10:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Blocked for Sockpuppetry" case

Could some administrator please unblock me? My reasons are after all valid, and I don't agree that I should be punished for someone else's crime. Besides, the other people who did the actual sockpuppetry haven't even been warned by the community, let alone been blocked. I can even give you their user IDs or our IP addresses. Please respond to this. I have been pleading with administrators for over three weeks now. For more information, please refer to my block log.

--UPDATE-- Thanks a lot, Anthony Bradbury, for giving me a chance to explain. I can honestly agree that I created the page Thekambattu. This is not a fictional place; it is where I live(in Salem district, Tamil Nadu, India). There was no vulgar or fictional content in the page. So I see nothing wrong in that particular action. However, I did not create the user ID Djvoldi. This was created by one of my schoolmates, who proceeded to write content that openly abuses me on "Thekambattu". As the school has a computer lab for internet work, and the computers are connected by a local intranet, my IP address is not constant. Thus, when the schoolmate modified the page Thekambattu, the Wikipedia committee immediately assumed that I had created two IDs and was causing trouble, while in truth, the schoolmate was using the computer which I had used earlier(thus our IP addresses were given as the same). Thus, I can further insist that I am innocent of the sockpuppetry case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.90.99.73 (talk) 02:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--VoldemortRams

Speedy deletion nomination of Thekambattu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Thekambattu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phileasson (talk) 10:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VoldemortRams for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Mkdw ^talk 11:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VoldemortRams. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 11:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VoldemortRams (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My computer is on a private network in a school. Since someone else on this network decided to write vandalising content about me, our entire network has been blocked for Wikipedia editing on the ground of sockpuppetry. I thus request you to unblock this account and all others on this network. I assure you that this act has been taken seriously and action has been taken against the person who wrote the bad content. This will not happen again. As Wikipedia is one of the few websites that we can access, it is really upsetting that even that cannot be edited. Please consider my request and respond to it. If there is anything you want to know about the prank, contact me at my user page. Once again, I assure you that this will not happen again.

Decline reason:

This all may well be true. But, first of all, all that we have seen from this account is the two edits that created this unblock request, and two edits to a deleted hoax article. That's not enough, nowhere near enough in fact, to give us confidence that this account will be used constructively if unblocked. Second, we have no way to confirm that this has happened—presently I don't even know your IP address. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.