User talk:VivaLaZombie!

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The article The Pants Situation has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 16:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti Progressive Anarchism

has been nominated by me for deletion. You seem to have borrowed a page from User:I AM BORED and created an article based on a totally non-existent book. If you can offer any proof that the book actually exists, rare or otherwise, please reply on the Deletion discussion. Thanks, Shawn in Montreal 19:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Anti Progressive Anarchism. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Your article was based on a book that was judged to be a hoax. If you can provide book that this book exists, please provide itShawn in Montreal 21:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]