User talk:Vinhloc30796

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo
Hello! Vinhloc30796, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!  Doctor (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
87 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Joe's Crab Shack (talk) Add sources
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Conan Role-Playing Game (talk) Add sources
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Libra (Marvel Comics) (talk) Add sources
72 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Marvel Super Heroes (role-playing game) (talk) Add sources
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Steven Cole (talk) Add sources
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Greyhawk Adventures (talk) Add sources
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Salem's Seven (talk) Cleanup
3,986 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Gangs of New York (talk) Cleanup
165 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C The Legend of Zelda (TV series) (talk) Cleanup
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Nicholas Scratch (talk) Expand
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Hall of Heroes (Forgotten Realms) (talk) Expand
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Chopper (Judge Dredd) (talk) Expand
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Prince Thun (talk) Unencyclopaedic
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Prince Barin (talk) Unencyclopaedic
100 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B V-chip (talk) Unencyclopaedic
42 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Dub localization (talk) Merge
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub The Nurses (ABC TV series) (talk) Merge
142 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Lolth (talk) Merge
101 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Thundra (talk) Wikify
91 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Nick Fury in other media (talk) Wikify
1,533 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Medusa (comics) (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Albert Carreres (talk) Orphan
163 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Star Wars: The Black Series (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Akporvik Hill (talk) Orphan
54 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Sheryl Leach (talk) Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Marvel Super Heroes Adventure Game (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Swords & Spells (talk) Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Louis Tinayre (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Pasteuriaceae (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Gargoyle (module) (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files for Upload

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! The file has been uploaded. Regards, GMGtalk 19:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 20:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 18:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest in Wikipedia

Hi Vinhloc30796. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing. Your edits to date are on all focused on Republic and are typical of a conflicted editor. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Information icon Hello, Vinhloc30796. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with Republic, directly or through a third party (e.g. a PR agency or the like)? You can answer however you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), I can walk you through how the "peer review" part happens and then, if you like, I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works, which will help you get the article created, or to understand why it cannot be created, at this time. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 07:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jytdog. Thank you for the notice. I would like to disclose that I'm working with and paid for by Republic. I did add the disclosure on top of Draft:Republic_(crowdfunding_platform) as you may have seen already. I actually look forward to the peer review and further steps - those will help tremendously in improving the article, which I truly believe is valuable in the crowdfunding and startup scene.
I'm also drafting my research on the AngelList article in my personal space - there is a COI here too since Republic is affiliated with AngelList. However, I'm not paid by AngelList. I'd really appreciate your guidance on how to best approach editing the AngelList article.
Thank you again for helping.
Vinhloc30796 (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your gracious reply. Would you please clarify -- are you an employee of Republic, an employee of a digital PR firm that has Republic as a client, or freelancing (self-employed and working under contract). Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the prompt reply, Jytdog. I'm freelancing. Vinhloc30796 (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jytdog - I'm just following up on whether you have received my last message. How's the progress with the peer-review? What should I do next with AngelList article now that my draft is done? Vinhloc30796 (talk) 22:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SeraphWiki (talk) 06:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Republic (crowdfunding platform), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Republic (crowdfunding platform) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Republic (crowdfunding platform) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 18:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon Hey Robert, thank you for the notice. Although the movement to delete the Republic article saddens me, I do understand why. However, I do have a good understanding of the equity crowdfunding ecosystem - a lot of the Wikipedia articles on equity crowdfunding platforms are very bad. I'd like to improve these articles as a way to build my contribution and experience up until I'm ready for the Republic article. In fact, the edits on AngelList (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AngelList&oldid=839659496) are mine. Please do let me know what you think, especially regarding whether or not I can even add to articles on equity crowdfunding due to my COI in working for Republic). Vinhloc30796 (talk) 20:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Vinhloc30796/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 21:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Republic (platform) (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Compusolus (talk) 11:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello hello @Compusolus! Thank you for your zappy response!
I've removed bad sources & added better sources. I've also added some controversies & negativities to the subject, hoping to make it more neutral.
Am I on the right direction? Vinhloc30796 (talk) 13:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, on the right track. Good work. Compusolus (talk) 03:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe worth taking a look at Republic_(fintech) @331dot @Compusolus because that got published way quicker than Draft:Republic_(platform) using the same content. Vinhloc30796 (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see that you mention that you are paid by Republic above, please place the formal paid editing disclosure on your user page(User:Vinhloc30796). Ideally you should also avoid directly editing the article about your company, instead making formal edit requests(click for instructions). 331dot (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm no longer working with them - I've left the company since 2020. Vinhloc30796 (talk) 09:09, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay. Do you still work in their field? 331dot (talk) 09:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Not in crowdfunding or fintech anymore. I'm still working in software though. Vinhloc30796 (talk) 09:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay. Thanks 331dot (talk) 11:53, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]