User talk:Varmakumar200

Welcome!

Hi Varmakumar200! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:04, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

In general, it is neither necessary nor desirable to create Wikilinks for every occurrence of a term in an article. A single link generally suffices. (See WP:OVERLINK.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:04, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Varmakumar200! Your additions to Mughal conquest of Malwa have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 18:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmud Invasion of Bhatia (1004) article

You need to take this "article" back to the draft space and do a major rewrite. It reads like you copy and pasted it from some poetic book. It is completely unencyclopedic and needs to be sourced by reliable sources.

Also, refrain from the personal attacks, it won't help your cause here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kansas Bear Blocked as a sock. I may do some reverting. Doug Weller talk 20:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Mahmud Invasion of Bhatia

Mahmud Invasion of Bhatia (1004)

This article is really great, this article should be published, this article is perfect thank you Lakx300 (talk) 03:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mahmud Invasion of Bhatia (1004). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RegentsPark (comment) 16:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 17:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A few days ago a user had removed the reference from my article and then he complained about me. The reason is that I used references from books of British Raj, that's fine but Wikipedia has many articles which also used books of British Raj, but it did not remove their reference, only removed my reference and if you I think for the sake of block, you block me and do whatever you feel is right, thank you very much.

[[ImperialAficionado]]=Here is that user Varmakumar200 (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]