User talk:Tumbultaaron

May 2013

I removed your subsequent edits to Eric Grimson. Blogs are not reliable sources. Glrx (talk) 14:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

haha, Glrx given your affiliation with Eric Grimson it is only more than natural you would oppose to the bitter truth. Let me add that these are not just blogs. these are academic blogs that are censored and reviewed. As a result, they are more than just reliable. Sorry. Please do not revert any changes. Grimson was involved in the ultimate downfall of Aaron Swartz which led to his suicide. This is an objectively correct statement which can be found on nytimes as well. The statement that Grimson and Abelson are long time buddies is also known. Tumbultaaron (talk) 01:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talk, please refrain from removing properly cited material to a living individual. The sources are well-regarded in academic standards. These remarks are far from defamatory, they are facts. Please stop harassing me, and my talk page because this is harassment. Tumbultaaron (talk) 03:54, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talk, please stop engaging in this destructive behavior. While you did make a valid points that blogs are usually an unreliable source, it should not surprise you that some blogs are very reliable. These type of blogs belong to academics who censore unwanted and untrue comments. Unfortunately, comments pertaining to the relationship between Grimson and Abelson are correct. And so are the comments pertaining to MIT's internal investigation. These facts are undisputed. Tumbultaaron (talk) 04:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Grimson

Tumbultaaron, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Tumbultaaron! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ublock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tumbultaaron (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason is very simple and clear. I am advocating the truth and wikipedia is a place where the truth however bitter and ugly should be promoted. I have done my homework on the case of Aaron Swartz and Eric Grimson and have a clear picture of what has been going on. I'd like to open up a section that addresses this issue in a way that does not violate the BPL rights. Since Eric Grimson is chancellor of the university he has been involved in upper level negotiations. Not allowing simple questions of this type on the Talk side that address his involvement goes against the basic rights and principles of wikipedia: Since when does wikipedia censure such statements ? While it is clear that if not addressed in an appropriate way that this might cause problems. The only thing that this block demonstrates is lack of understanding. Kindly unblock me o that I can address concerns in an appropriate way. Tumbultaaron (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"The only thing that this block demonstrates is lack of understanding." Your right, a misunderstanding on your part that we do not accept multiple account abuse. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 09:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.