User talk:Tuchler

Martin Zielke

Thank you for creating a Wikipedia article about Martin Zielke. We have just made some minor changes and hope you are fine with it. Please let us know if there is anything else we can do to improve the Wikipedia article. -- Oliver at Commerzbank (talk) 12:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest in Wikipedia

Hi Tuchler. I spend time working on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing, which is mostly about health and medicine. I am not an administrator. Your edits to date look like digital marketing or PR on behalf of German businesspeople.

Lots of people come to Wikipedia with some sort of conflict of interest and are not aware of how the editing community defines and manages conflict of interest. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Tuchler. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. Unmanaged conflicts of interest can also lead to people behaving in ways that violate our behavioral policies and cause disruption in the normal editing process. Managing conflict of interest well, also protects conflicted editors themselves - please see WP:Wikipedia is in the real world, and Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia for some guidance and stories about people who have brought bad press upon themselves through unmanaged conflict of interest editing.

As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with subjects about whom you have edited, directly or through a third party (e.g. a PR agency or the like)? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it, and if you are editing for pay or the expectation of being paid, you must disclose that. After you respond (and you can just reply below), if it is relevant I can walk you through how the "peer review" part happens and then, if you like, I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 12:45, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Mandatory paid editing disclosure

Hello Tuchler. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tuchler. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tuchler|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Jytdog (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jytdog, your assumption is not true, I did not edit the articles out of financial interests or for marketing as you wrote above. I became an editor while searching for additional personal information on important, previous and current, managers of major German stock companies. I found out that many of them had only small English articles in comparison to the German articles. So I began to translate missing content into English. Just read the German articles and you will see that I translated them. Some of the German articles had references which did not work or needed more references and I searched for new references too. When I found new information during my search I wrote additional content. When I saw managers, who were mentioned at companies' articles and had no own articles, I created new articles for such managers with translations or new content in my sandbox and published them.--Tuchler (talk) 19:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. Would you please explain the coordination with the representative of Commerzbank? In case you are not aware, there is a place for conflicted or paid editing in Wikipedia, but there is a procedure for this.Jytdog (talk) 19:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jytdog: Hello Jytdog! Thanks for taking a closer look at the contributions of Tuchler. We have absolutely no relationship and just stepped in when we saw the Martin Zielke article arriving on our watchlist. As some of the biographical details were wrong or at least misleading, I did a quick update. (I am aware of request edit and other best practices, but I still hope in that particular case it was acceptable.) If you have any further questions, please let me know. Thanks again, -- Oliver at Commerzbank (talk) 06:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

It was not acceptable but we can deal with that on your talk page. Given how severely you misrepresented this edit, I cannot trust your claim of no relationship. You have complicated the situation here. Jytdog (talk) 13:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jytdog, I did not coordinate anything with a representative of Commerzbank. I just translated the German article of Zielke and added new information like I did with other German managers before. Then the editor Oliver of Commerzbank changed the article in favour of his employer and violated rules. And now he even wrote on my page. I don't know if that was ok or allowed. But as you said, it complicated the situation. I just can repeat that I don't know Oliver or any other person from Commerzbank. This is also true for the companies of the other German managers I edited. What can I do?--Tuchler (talk) 20:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Translating pages and attribution

Hello again. If you are translating pages from another wiki, I suggest also using the {{Translated page}} template on its talk page. Even if not necessarily a translation, when material is borrowed from another article or location, it's important to attribute where (which was not always done (including for Draft:Martin Zielke), I see that you sometimes did like here, which is good practice. Even just a mention in the edit summary helps. See WP:COPYWITHIN for further information.

As for conflict of interest, I myself found interesting that multiple BLPs about business people were created. It's also possible that the German encyclopedia is not as strict as the English one in relation to promotion and notability, or not as well patrolled, resulting in this situation when translating articles. This still does not explain why pages about multiple people related to that particular bank were created. —PaleoNeonate – 03:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello PaleoNeonate, nice to meet you and thank you for your advice on the Translated page template. Also the paragraph on translations from other language Wikimedia projects at WP:COPYWITHIN was very helpful. Thanks again.

You said, that you found interesting that I created several articles on German business people. If you check their companies you will find out that they all belong to the DAX index of the 30 major German companies. In the German Wikipedia every CEO and chairman of a DAX company has an article. It is the same for the companies of the major US index Dow Jones Industrial Average, except Visa, UnitedHealth Group and Chevron.

With most of my edits I worked on people named in the box at the top of a company article when their articles were small or missing: at United Internet it was Ralp Dommermuth (my first edit), at Deutsche Post it were Melanie Kreis and Wolf von Schimmelmann, at BMW it was Harald Krüger, at Fresenius it was Stephan Sturm, at Bayer AG it were Werner Bauman and Werner Wenning, at Commerzbank it were Martin Zielke and Stefan Schmittmann. My next page is on the CEO named in the box of Wirecard, the German bank which will replace the Commerzbank in the DAX index. The only exception was Kurt Bock, former CEO of BASF, who resigned in May 2018. At the end of July there were some discussions related to Bock in the German national press on the mandatory cooling-off period for resigning DAX-CEOs, which have to wait for two years before they can become board chairman of the company. Here I took notice of Bock.

Just read companies' articles and you will find all the names in their boxes. The existing content of the boxes determined my edits. I did not coordinate them with anyone, I simply followed the names that I found.--Tuchler (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

I was asked to look at these. I agree the articles are of good quality and the people notable. (tho it is possible that some English readers will not be aware of German corporate titles for the CEO). You writing here is skillful, and you know the enWP style, so it is likely that you have edited WP under some other name. If so, you would do well to declare it, especially if you have edited in this field here or on the deWP. Our rules for COI are interpreted much more strictly than they are at deWP, so at the least you should disclose any other usernames confidentially to arbcom, which will protect you against incorrect sockpuppet accusations. DGG ( talk ) 19:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello DGG, nice to meet you and thank you for your positive feedback on my work. Most of it are translations and always I try to use language similar to other articles because English is not my native language. And I want to learn more things like finding new references, Templates for translations and infoboxes, categories, sort pages by default or today the Flickr photos. I haven't edited in this field here under some other name and I did not work on German articles, too.--Tuchler (talk) 23:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elmar Degenhart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Continental (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Martin Zielke) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Martin Zielke.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please go through the AfC process.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Martin Zielke moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Martin Zielke, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Zielke has been accepted

Martin Zielke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 08:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Werner Wenning

Hello, Tuchler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Werner Wenning".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tuchler

Thank you for creating Hanns Altermann.

User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article. I hope you will add more sources in article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gazal world}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gazal world (talk) 12:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)