User talk:Traversetravis
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
October 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of traditional territories of the indigenous peoples of North America has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of traditional territories of the indigenous peoples of North America was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.geocities.com/Athens/9479/pomo.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of traditional territories of the indigenous peoples of North America, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Piegan and Wendat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
January 2019
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button
located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Nardog (talk) 13:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anthroposophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romuva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seneca people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autonym (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Universal grammar are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Megaman en m (talk) 08:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
November 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dungeons & Dragons campaign settings, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 20:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Sariel Xilo. Note: It's true that my Mystara edit I didn't add references; yet it's also true that the original three paragraphs on Mystara (before my edit) also contain *zero* references. Yet you have not deleted the original paragraphs!
- Are you not familiar with the setting? Do you only delete the sentences that extend beyond your personal knowledge? But you have no problem with unreferenced vagaries that you personally know?
- Should I delete the whole paragraph since it's unreferenced, and leave you a similarly terse note on your Talk page?
- Something like: "Sariel do not leave three paragraphs unreferenced as you have, without citing a reliable source. Sariel, please review the guidelines."
- I'm one of the main historians of the setting, having conducted and published many interviews with Mystaran designers from the TSR era. Everything I wrote in the Mystara section is true. Much of it is well-known "common knowledge" to Mystara grognards. Just because another editor doesn't know it, doesn't mean it's any less true than the unreferenced vagaries in the original paragraphs.
- For example, why do you leave "Rome" unreferenced, but delete "Byzantium"? Why do you leave "Medieval" unreferenced but delete "Renaissance"? You leave "European" and "Asian" unreferenced but delete "African" and "Oceanian"? (Every Mystara fan knows that Ylaruam is partially an analogue of Arab Egypt (hence the pyramids!), which is in Africa. And that the Makai of Ierendi are native Hawaiian analogues.)
- Still, I can provide references. That's fine. I'm just irked that while deleting my unreferenced (but true) paragraphs, you then revert to similarly unreferenced paragraphs! What are your personal criteria?
- Traversetravis (talk) 02:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- So far, the only aspect of your edits that I've reverted are when you created headings & then dropped bare urls below them. When I've added content to this article, I've made sure to include references since this article was tagged in 2018 as having an issue with a lack of references. When you make edits on the assumption something is "common" fan knowledge without adding references, you're doing original research so I would suggest reviewing the Wikipedia:No original research policy. If you have sources, please use them. Additionally, edits are judged on individual merits so you might benefit from reviewing WP:WHATABOUTX & WP:OTHERCONTENT (they're geared towards discussions about article deletion but do a pretty good job summarizing why we judge content on individual merits). For example, the second essay states: From the logical perspective, this argument is an example of the logical fallacy known as the fallacy of relative privation (also known as "appeal to worse problems" or "not as bad as"). Sariel Xilo (talk) 03:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, okay, I though it was you who reverted the fresh paragraphs I wrote on Mystara. In that case, my ire is misplaced. I didn't see a signature on the revert.
- Yeah, when I originally posted just the bare links for Diablo II and Conan/Red Sonja, I was in a hurry - yet the links did show the entire product lines for those settings. They weren't "spam" in the sense of advertising or something. I was hoping someone would would tidy it up (by writing a sentence or two). But I admit that was sloppy of me. Fair enough. I did go back and write proper entries for Diablo II and Conan/Red Sonja. Traversetravis (talk) 03:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)