User talk:Torfors

Hi there. Is there any good video or orientation you would recommend? I'm very new to the community and finding it difficult to understand how to join a project team (I'm interested in biographies, especially on activists), chat with other users or identify which articles are a priority for review. Any advice appreciated! Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, DiDi Delgado, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Torfors/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Torfors/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Torfors! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:DiDi Delgado has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:DiDi Delgado. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 13:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
2	Rubislaw and Queens Terrace Gardens (talk)	Add sources
4	Scotstown Moor (talk)	Add sources
3	Bhanai (talk)	Add sources
9	Hazlehead Park (talk)	Add sources
450	Culture of Rajasthan (talk)	Add sources
7	Religion in Aberdeen (talk)	Add sources
26	Britain in Bloom (talk)	Cleanup
44	Bagru (talk)	Cleanup
16	Tzedek (charity) (talk)	Cleanup
8	Politics of Aberdeen (talk)	Expand
28	Postal codes in South Korea (talk)	Expand
6	Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit System (talk)	Expand
5	Bhirani (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
137	All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
161	Bharatpur, Rajasthan (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2	Ant (magazine) (talk)	Merge
2	Poets Roundtable of Arkansas (talk)	Merge
2	Tassi Hangbé (talk)	Merge
37	UNICEF UK (talk)	Wikify
36	St Machar's Cathedral (talk)	Wikify
10	Ashill, Norfolk (talk)	Wikify
10	Rohini College of Engineering & Technology (talk)	Orphan
2	Kobilmahagu (talk)	Orphan
2	Pulse foundation (talk)	Orphan
3	Torwarsak (talk)	Stub
6	Johnston Gardens (talk)	Stub
13	Tracey Thomson (talk)	Stub
6	Victoria Park, Aberdeen (talk)	Stub
3	Stewart Park, Aberdeen (talk)	Stub
6	Cruickshank Botanic Garden (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marginalized Genders

The article Marginalized Genders has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Passenger pigeon (talk) 14:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DiDi Delgado (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hyperlinks to author profile pages, self-published sources, and passing mentions are not sufficient to establish notability. Please see WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DiDi Delgado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DiDi Delgado, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DiDi Delgado

Hello, Torfors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DiDi Delgado, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DiDi Delgado (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carpimaps was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still, many sources are passing mentions that does not discuss Delgado in detail. Besides the NBC citation, they are mostly about one Facebook post that this person made and the events she participated in. No source besides NBC discusses the subject as a person. There are also too many primary sources; remove some. Remember: 1 good source is better than 100 questionable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DiDi Delgado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 12:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]