User talk:Tickle me

I will respond to entries on my talk page right here. Also, I'll keep your talk page on my watchlist after posting on it, so you can answer there, keeping threads intact and readable. For older posts see archive1/archive2. --tickle me 02:48, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clean slate

Let me know if I can be of further assistance. JDoorj a m Talk 18:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

A case in which you are a party (Banu Nadir) has been submitted to mediation by the Mediation Cabal. Please review the proposed solution in this case.Geo. 19:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Mu'tah

You've added in the history page: "a soldier's view is relevant only adhering to a literal interpretation of sources, which WP doesn't, else A.I. Akram is a non-descript, self-taught historian at best"

I added this links, because there was many people on the talk page requesting sources. I know, A.I. Akram may not be the source, but in his book, he shows many of them. He had studied very early islamic sources, and interpreted them. But he shows the sources, so anybody can look at them, then he may interpret. What do you say about this?Mfyuce 07:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)mfyuce[reply]

Please cf WP:V, particularly "3.4 Self-published sources (online and paper)" and WP:RS:

3 Beware false authority
6 Using online and self-published sources
8.1 History

All applies to a military who claims to be knowledgeable on history without proving his scholarship and without known and verifiable reference for his scholarly reputation in the field. WP policy doesn't mandate any source to be better than none. On the other side, the Encyclopaedia of Islam is a work of reference. Also, please post this on the article's page, where the discussion belongs. Unless you really understood WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:NOT and WP:OR you won't succeed - we all had to read this sooner or later. --tickle me 11:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reference

There is a valid reference but it's in Persian .مهر تابان. This is told by Allameh Tabatabaei. Therefor it's valid.--Sa.vakilian 01:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mosque

Why did you revert Pessimists' edits too? BhaiSaab ^talk 21:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation2truth

Invitation2truth (talk · contribs) has been adding the same linkspam into about 30 articles. I've reverted most of them, but it looks like he may be starting over. Fan-1967 03:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admins handled the problem. --tickle me 01:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dada page

Please explain why you reverted the change in the intro to the Dada page. Dada is not charecterized by nihilism - it is a political anti-war movement. Please justify your claim... Thanks 62.25.106.209 13:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cf. WP:RS and WP:V. You're to back up your claims with reliable, verifiable, and authoritative sources. You won't have problems anymore once you do. --tickle me 01:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong - there are no sources or verification for the assertion of cynicism or nihilism - this is just encyclopaedic analysis.Please see Dada talk page.62.25.106.209 12:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You already added {{fact}} to everything you deem to be unsourced or mere encyclopaedic analysis (OR), which is quite OK as an act of politeness, as others now have the chance to source their claims. You could even delete it. However, when inserting your claims, you're to follow the same guidelines. You did what what you're blame others for: inserting unsourced OR. Why don't you do research first and edit accordingly, citing sources? --tickle me 13:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are already there - all throughout the article , just read it! I just removed some POV statements about the 'charecteristics' of the dada style. The radical critique of imperial war was there throughout the movement and were its orignial impetus and defining political and artistic line - as the rest of the article explains. 195.92.40.49 10:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

distotion

Hi,

Please look at Hezbollah talk page. I described that Nasrollah's quotation is distorted. if they [Jews] all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide. If you read the text of his qutations you find that he didn't speak about Jews at all. He spoke about zionist and we know some of jews aren't Zionist.--Sa.vakilian 05:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Kramer article

Your last edit seems to have destroyed most of the article; I'm not sure how much you intended to remove. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First I wrangled with Firefox quirks, than there was a temp WP database lock-up. I fixed it now, thx for the patience. --tickle me 00:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hezbollah Edits

It would be appreciated if you used the talk page, rather than the Edit Summary, to discuss your views on editorial policy. JiHymas@himivest.com 00:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your posts

Hi, I don't see why anyone would sanction you for restoring your own posts. You've asked several times for people not to post inside your comments, so if they continue to do it, I see no problem with you restoring the integrity of your own post. Perhaps you could simply post your original post above the comments they've woven into yours; in that way, you're restoring your own material without changing theirs. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 21:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missy Myatt

I would like to comment on your editing of the David Myatt article which seems to contradict the policy of Wikipedia in respect of articles about living people. You continue to insert what seem to be inappropriate comments in your Edit Summary. Wikipedia is about NPOV - your comments appear to detract from that. Coolmoon 13:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O dear, if only ~~the Führer~~ Mr. Myatt could hear that. Hopefully, I could assuage your concerns. Trust me, you seem to be agitated by what might seem, at first sight and just hastily reviewed, as impudent and unmindful edit summaries, directed at some hapless IP, whose interest, apart from wikiland's, you defend valiantly - as could well be expected from the gentleman that you are. I trust you, however, to see at least some inner beauty, and the corresponding edit's propriety, on thorough and thoughtful inspection.

Should, by chance, an empty stomach be a pertaining element to the irritation that guided your ways to my humble wikipedic shed - may I suggest, say, some hearty bangers and mash, possibly Worcestershire sauce caring for digestive spice, to gratify nature's demands? Afterwards, let's meet again on gentler terms.

One grave issue, though, remains to be answered: Please, don't you mingle your postings, welcome, cherished, and valuable as they are, with those of the slimmest of virgins, dear and helpful in my wikipedic woes. À la prochaine, veuillez vous vous servir de cet lien si convenant, mon Pierrot Lunaire très estimé? Tout a fait votre serviteur le plus dédié: --tickle me 16:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tickle - you are quite right in one respect. I should not have mingled myself with SlimVirgin. Anyways, thank you for your reply. Gentler terms are always the best! Coolmoon 17:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Sardar Article

Thanks for the cleanup. I'd been leery of going in and pulling all those quotes, but it was a needed operation. Thanks. MerricMaker 02:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roman=Byzantine is NOT OR

Moved to Talk:Battle_of_Mu'tah#Roman_.3D_Byzantine. --tickle me 02:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 8 hours

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Stifle (talk) 10:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what I was thinking, mostly I can count to three... --tickle me 02:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"elaborate"

Moved to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Changes_to_discussion. --tickle me 01:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving comments

Regarding this, please don't move people's comments. I don't know what "interposting" is, but I don't think samsara would appreciate your moving of his comments very much. Thanks.--§hanel 05:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"interposting": You don't need to know, as I spelled it out on that page, for the second time:

"Again, I ask all repliers to cite and quote, not to interpost. --tickle me 03:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)"

Besides, that's what WP:WQT says:

"Interweaving rebuttals into the middle of another person's comments, however, is generally a bad idea. It disrupts the flow of the discussion and breaks the attribution of comments. It may be intelligible to the two of you but it's virtually impossible for the rest of the community to follow."

I think WP:WQT had a good idea, so do others. I happen to not like samsara or whomever to move my posts in the first place, did you choose to ignore that? And let's not get into semantics, pls? Besides, I certainly don't "appreciate very much" samsara to alter my edits, on top of tattering them. --tickle me 06:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a forum, where one user's posts are atomic and cannot be split. Wikipedia:Etiquette is a guideline, not a policy, and is not to be used as a club with which to beat your opponent around the head. If one person presents their comment as a huge flow of paragraphs, it is common practice when replying to one specific paragraph to attach the reply to that paragraph with an extra indent: there is no licence to fill the entire screen with one person's opinion with no recourse to discussion. To be blunt, moving someone's reply away from its context so that it now makes no sense is a greater breach of etiquette, and a good example of the bad behaviour about which you appear to be complaining. You seem to have been here a while, so one would have expected you to pick up on this by now. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 07:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"there is no licence to fill the entire screen": That's my post, half a screen on 1024, 15 lines. What's huge about it?

"recourse to discussion": the recourse at hand is to cite and answer.

"It may be intelligible to the two of you but it's virtually impossible for the rest of the community to follow": WQT deals with talk pages, not forums. Even if only a guideline. Is it so far fetched?

"To be blunt, moving someone's reply": I want others to be able to follow, even if they happen to pop up next week. And yes, split threads make it hard to follow.

"beat your opponent around the head": pschemp asks me to "go jump in the lake"? I'm a outlawed already? Who's beating?

Why can samsara edit and vandalise my posts? sheer admin power?

--tickle me 07:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's because you reverted [1] my correction [2] of your translation of my prose. I think I know what I meant. I can only urge you to stop doing that. Since this translation game seems to be a new one, I'm happy to explore the policy situation on this. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 09:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You *are* not to correct my edits, arguably except for libel. Have a RfC on that, fine. It's not about what you meant anyway, that's for you to explain if you so feel - it's about what you wrote. And it's telling that you don't engage in a translation debate, however uncalled for that would be - instead you ressort to vandalism.

My translation is public. Alleging a "game" is administrative smear. You may add your own or contend it publicly. You're trying to intimidate me; being an admin, your abusing your powers. --tickle me 10:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're accusing me of various wild things. Tell me what you would do. Lay down and die? You must be kidding. So let's continue the discussion without detracting from the real issues. If you think that you can use my being an admin as an argument for me not being allowed to talk to you, something in your brain is screwed up. Show me where I've intimidated you. So far, you are the one trying to get me framed for vandalism. Funny, that. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 12:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

for the buffs

Not that it matters, but this is my party:

Samsara's German version:

Ich bin dann die Quellen durchgegangen, um sicherzustellen, dass auch alle Statements durch Quellen untermauert sind

Samsara's translation:

I then went through the sources to make sure than all statements were supported by sources. [than: sic]

Mine:

I then perused the sources to make sure that absolutely all statements are backed by sources

The German conjunction auch is wholly redundant in the sentence above, lest it is interpreted as reinforcement - or as idiomatically poor. I assumed the former, the latter is on the house. ja auch being the next step intensification, one might argue how to confer a single auch's semantics here: be my guest. --tickle me 10:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm your guest. I wrote that passage. I can translate it. End of story. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nasrallah

Tickle me, can you provide a link for the articles you mentioned. I tried to find the NYT one but I could not. BhaiSaab ^talk 18:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pls Ctrl+F for "New York Times": there's only on NYT article linked. That goes for "New York Sun", "Michael Rubin", and "Amal Saad-Ghorayeb" as well. Pls move this to the article talk, should you want to follow up. --tickle me 18:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Roth Institute

I noticed you've done most of the work on the Stephen Roth Institute. The SRI website has served as an excellent source for a significant chunk of the content on the Venezuelan-Israeli relations page. I thought you might like to know. Respectfully, Republitarian 22:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thx. I'm too busy to care for the Venezuelan article presently. If you need Spanish bits translated, however, feel free to ask. --tickle me 23:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asinine WSJ article

Re Bernard Lewis, there is no inference in the following text:

Ahmadinejad had said that Iran will respond "by the last days of ''Mordad''", the 5th month of the [[Persian calendar]].<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/iran/story/2006/06/060621_mf_nuc_ahmadinejad.shtml BBC Persian], "Iran will respond to the EU3 nuclear proposal by late Mordad", 1 Tir 1385</ref> English translations picked the last day of that month, converted it into the Georgian calendar and omitted any hints to the original context. In addition, Lewis failed to note that Rajab 27 (which falls on the last day of Mordad in the Persian calendar year of 1385) is not recognized as the night of [[Isra and Mi'raj|Mi'raj]] by the [[Shi'a Islam|Shi'as]][http://www.hawzah.net/per/e/do.asp?a=ECCBBJ.htm] (the official religion of Iran is Shi'a Islam), but is known as the day of Mohammad's first calling or Mab'as, an event that is unrelated to the story of Mi'raj and Mohammad's purported flight to Jerusalem.

These are facts related to his article. In anycase, I propose removing the reference to that article all-together. A rather minor bleep in his long career. Kaveh 20:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That "English translations" picked/converted/omitted something may be true, it's your WP:OR nevertheless. That Lewis "failed to note" something is your OR, or POV, too - as is the rest.

Summing up: if such a prominent scholar commits such an egregious, blatant, shameful, and, as you call it, asinine blunder, the press, both popular and specialised, should be full with corresponding comments. These you are to find and cite. You're not to correct Lewis presenting your findings. Should you wish to follow up: please move this thread to the article's talk page where it belongs. --tickle me 12:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Acrimony

Patchouli has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

I added the new image to end acrimony and leave behind the haystack of words. You can remove my "crank" remark if you so choose.--Patchouli 22:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Anti-semitism

Hi. Your reverts on the page New anti-semitism are not very constructive. If you would like to make your case, please refer to the discussion page. If you are in doubt, check the source I'm using, before continuing your edit war...pertn 10:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Synagogenbilder

Hallo Tickle me, den beiden von dir hochgeladenen Innen- und Außenansichten der Synagoge Zerrenerstr. droht Löschung, und damit würde der exzellente Artikel Novemberpogrome die letzten authentischen Bilder zum Thema verlieren. Grund scheinen unzureichende Angaben zur Erlaubnis des Fotografen, die Bilder unter GNUFDL zu nutzen, zu sein. (siehe [3]) Kannst du dich zeitnah darum mal kümmern?

Wäre doch sonst echt schade drum. Herzlich grüßt Jesusfreund 08:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please helping the Cactus

On WP:ARCAID, I think Rosetta Stone and Cactus are worthy of our support. Can you BELIEVE we not have good article on Rosetta Stone or the cactus yet?Opiner 10:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Rosetta Stone as this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Rosetta Stone was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 16:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Edward Said thowing a stone at Israeli soldiers.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Edward Said thowing a stone at Israeli soldiers.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A valid "rationale" was given right at the bottom, I just forgot to label it "fair use rationale." --tickle me 00:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your consideration

Thank you for the consideration you gave to my RfA. To be chosen as an administrator requires a high level of confidence by a broad section of the community. Although I received a great deal of support, at this time I do not hold the level of confidence required, and the RfA did not pass. You were one of the oppose votes, and raised concerns. I am more than willing to discuss those concerns with you if you are interested. Please let me know. Sincerely, --BostonMA ^talk 03:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Shariati

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Ali Shariati. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Plm209 13:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is it about my reasoning, that couldn't be understood? Could you not be bothered to look up a WP:RS's definition? Or is it the circular reference, that needs explanation? While we are at it, have a look at this and that. Pray you Sir, contact me, should you need exegetical assistance. --tickle me 08:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks for your support in my RfA. I've felt it best to withdraw on this occasion and think about the good advice I received. Thanks again, Jakew 20:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Screen scraping

Hi. Please clarify for me - picking but one example from Screen scraping, do you disagree with my assertion that the following both an inappropriate external link per WP:EL, non-notable, and adds nothing to the article?

Dapper is a web-based GUI tool for extracting content from any website.

Thanks, CiaranG 22:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's free gui based web scraping service for non-programmers, thus its perfectly pertinent. --tickle me 22:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced it's anything other than linkspam added to the page to promote the company's service. I don't think the article should contain a list of links to any and all products relating to web scraping, regardless of notability, but I sense we disagree. CiaranG 23:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The site may well have been listed by its owner for selfish reasons. However, we don't punish intent, but evaluate usefulness. As screen scraping can be done either by programmers writing code or by non-programmers using a gui, its perfectly ok pointing to both. If you find a non commercial service providing gui-based screen scraping, say, at sourceforge, we won't need the commercial site any more. --tickle me 01:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted an editor's vote

Are you aware that when you cast your vote in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-globalization and antisemitism (2nd nomination) article deletion debate, you deleted [4] the vote of the editor who proceeded you? J.R. Hercules 06:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving me the benefit of the doubt, that's really embarrassing. I restored his vote. --tickle me 17:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale

Reguarding your uploading of Image:Abdul Rahman(convert).jpg, please provide a Fair use rationale.--Sefringle 23:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok. --tickle me 00:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request For Mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/David Irving, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. (msg by Wikidudeman)

Hi, not needed anymore, as the issue has already reached consensus. --tickle me 13:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit on Islamic toilet etiquette

[5] I do not understand your revert it seems justified because all of the etiquette listed are sourced from the Koran and is sort of a disclaimer. Please explain. I did not revert your edit because I was unclear about this motive. Thanks.-Ran da l l l in 02:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP doesn't disclaim, except were legally binding, e.g. with medical issues. Besides, looking up the Koran and making inferences is WP:OR. You need authoritative theologians to make claims about how the Koran or any book is to be understood. If you feel that it can be taken at face value, than that's your POV, which we aren't to use writing articles. Besides, discusson on article topics should be done on the articles' discussion pages, so others know. --tickle me 04:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use problem with Image:Lebanese Hezbollah recruts being sworn in.jpg

I notice you uploaded the image Image:Lebanese Hezbollah recruts being sworn in.jpg with the {{current tag name}} fair use image tag. However, it appears that this tag is totally unrelated to the content of the image, and as a result it may qualify for speedy deletion. Image:Lebanese Hezbollah recruts being sworn in.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why Image:Lebanese Hezbollah recruts being sworn in.jpg can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the {{current tag name}} tag that you have placed on it with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can reupload it but please ensure you place the correct tag on it. However, you must not remove the speedy deletion notice. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Khorshid 07:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please write your reasons about using this image in Heabollah article in Talk:Hezbollah# Fair use rational--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 09:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of Lebanese_Hezbollah_recruts_being_sworn_in.jpg

Why did you delete Image:Lebanese_Hezbollah_recruts_being_sworn_in.jpg? It complies fully with WP:COPYRIGHT#Fair_use_materials_and_special_requirements by form and content, a detailed rationale was given. --tickle me 15:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted because the image had a clearly invalid fair use tag; or it was an image that failed some part of the fair use criteria and the uploader had been given 48 hours' notification (for images uploaded after 13 July 2006) or seven days' notification (for images uploaded before that date). (CSD I7). - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The fair use tag was valid, neither you nor anybody else gave a sensible reasoning. Stating that it was "clearly" invalid doesn't make it a sound argument. The image didn't fail any part of the fair use criteria.

This is the rationale given:

Fair use claimed for the History of Hezbollah, Hezbollah military activities and Hezbollah#Armed_strength articles because the Roman Salute, unknown to Ottoman and Arab armies, had been introduced both to Arab armies and paramilitaries by German instructors who fled after WWII, together with the adherent ideology. The picture thus illustrates the unison of religious affiliation and military discipline, which is Hezbollah's distinguishing mark.

Fair use claimed for Roman Salute, as Hezbollah is one of the few examples in modern time using that salute, elsewhere shunned for its historical implications, as it has been widely used by 20th century European fascism.

this is what was contested:

There isn't fair use rational like what you can find in Image:Nasrallah on al-Manar television.jpg. There is written I couldn't find copyright free depictions of such ceremonies on flickr or similar sources. This is not a good rational.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 04:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that but it is being used in 3 articles, which is a violation of fair use. Khorshid 07:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I answered that on the images' talk page in due time. What is pertinent about these arguments? --tickle me 15:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I copied this debate in Talk:Hezbollah# Fair use rational. Please write your idea there. Thanks.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 15:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1915 Dance by Rodchenko.jpg

Hello, Tickle me. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:1915 Dance by Rodchenko.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Tickle me/archive2. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yohanan Friedmann.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yohanan Friedmann.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Y not? 15:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lebanese Hezbollah recruts being sworn in.jpg

Hello, Tickle me. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Lebanese Hezbollah recruts being sworn in.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Tickle me/tmp. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 17:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Martinus von Biberach

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Martinus von Biberach, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.130.152.219 15:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lebanese_Hezbollah_recruts_being_sworn_in.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lebanese_Hezbollah_recruts_being_sworn_in.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bleh999 21:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Abdul Rahman(convert).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Abdul Rahman(convert).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. effeietsanders 08:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vidal Sassoon International Centre for the Study of Antisemitism

The above is incorrect. --Ludvikus 13:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism

Dear "Tickle me,"

I've forgotten how to make certain corrections.

In the above, the spelling "Centre" is simply wrong.

The Center (to my knowledge) always uses the spelling "Center."

Can you make the corrections?

Thanks.

--Ludvikus 13:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Homer Laughlin Bldg.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Homer Laughlin Bldg.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 14:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Homer Laughlin Bldg.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Homer Laughlin Bldg.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 14:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Want to weigh in on the Rushdie fatwa and Cat Stevens controversy?

I'm trying to get a volunteer mediator interested in the Cat Stevens article, (here), specifically my hope to add what stevens said about Rushdie ("He must be killed. The Qur'an makes it clear - if someone defames the prophet, then he must die." [1] )

Newspapers quickly interpreted his response -- "He must be killed. The Qur'an makes it clear - if someone defames the prophet, then he must die." [1] -- as support for the fatwa.

It seems like the major issue is whether anybody cares, i.e. is everyone happy with the article the way it is. So if you want the quote (the part that's not in italics above) added please tell the mediator. here

--BoogaLouie (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bert Vaux

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bert Vaux, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Vaux. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 08:39, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Rfa

Well, not this time anyway it seems...my effort to regain my adminship was unsuccessful, but your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 06:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Die Jugend 1896.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Die Jugend 1896.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My request for bureaucratship

Dear Tickle me, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your concerns about my candidacy. Unfortunately very few of the opposes gave me advice on points I should improve upon (bar the examples of incivility), and I ask you now, very humbly, to visit my talkpage, should you have any concerns about any of my actions here.
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. ~ Riana ⁂ 07:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Tickle me! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salah_choudhury.jpg

I have tagged Image:Salah_choudhury.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. howcheng {chat} 20:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim Association of Britain

Could you please explain on the talk page of this article why you restored that material? Thanks. If you haven't already seen it, you might want to review this first. cheers, Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fethullah Gulen

please show where you think the problem is in Fethullah Gulen article, and how to fix it -if you are for improving the article, of course-... if you specify and locate the problem i can fix it. labeling the whole article with an incorrect label may give wrong impression and distort the facts expressed in it. prove the statements you posted on the discussion page: what is disinformation? if not, please stop doing that. thanks. 76.181.224.82 (talk) 04:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i am glad you are not. and if you do not stop labeling the article i will ask an admin take care of the article. it is unfair to label the whole article claiming NPOV without specifying where the problem is. you can do the same for the all wiki articles. if you can specify and locate the problem, it can be worked out. i cannot read your mind. please stop labeling the work by many wikipadians just because it is not parallel to your POV. for me the article follows all guidelines specified in NPOV, Verifiability, and NOR. if you think otherwise, it is your task to show where and how... again, before taking the issue to the admin level, please stop labeling. thanks... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.172.221.206 (talk) 17:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The vandal who left these messages has been booted so feel free to clean up the article. There is much work to be done, so we'd appreciate a hand. See the talk page. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 14:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of apartheid deletion notification

Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of American apartheid. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO (talk) 18:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Trouw-1977-Zoehair Mohsen.jpg

Why did you upload it to Commons, when it's very doubtful that it's available under an appropriate fully-free license? It would have been better on Wikipedia itself... AnonMoos (talk) 03:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cat Stevens' comments about Salman Rushdie

re your edit: there still are copies of the video, though not on youtube, check my edits. --tickle me 19:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about: As of late 2008 videos on the issue are no longer available on youtube or Granada Television website. or

As of late 2008 videos only one video on the issue is available on the internet - an excerpt from Hypotheticals TV program on archive.org. --BoogaLouie (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Nice to see you editing again. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:44, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the Islamophobia article

Hello. I noticed you made some edits to the Islamophobia article some weeks back so as to bring it into balance. It's sprotected and I can't edit it. May I suggest an addition to the article that you could perhaps carry out after inspecting the source? There is an article by Robert Wistrich from the Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism that points out that giving excessive truck to perceived "Islamophobia" is a fallacy of multiculturalism and can lead to ignoring the rise of Islam and antisemitism. Here is the paper. The relevant passage is from the final para, which I shall reproduce here for your benefit should you choose to consider the material.

“

Multiculturalism in its present configuration has clearly failed. 30 If anything, it has encouraged Islamic radicalism in the name of “diversity” and a mindless cultural relativism. It has permitted Western democratic identity and liberties to be steadily undermined, human rights abuses to be ignored (including terrorist intimidation,

forced marriages, polygamy, and vicious antisemitism) and the fabric of civilised society to be seriously threatened. “Islamophobia”, with the tacit or open complicity of liberal and left-wing apologists, has become the dominant myth with which to silence dissent or menace the lives of would-be reformers or critics of Islam. Islamist radicals, using the fig-leaf of multiculturalist “tolerance” have been able to stoke up anger and resentment against “secular” “Christian” societies in America or Europe, as well as against the Jews and Israel. Under the protective shield of a misplaced liberal pluralism, the preachers of hate have reinforced the paranoia and siege mentality of growing numbers of Muslims, opening the floodgates of fundamentalist antisemitism and hatred of the West.

”

Also, the section [[6]] has a para attacking Hindus that is complete Original Research. The reference cited is poor and unreliable, and has more to do with disallowing illegal immigrants from Bangladesh than any perceived systemic discrimination. The other source cited, the Sachar Committee report, is controversial and has been criticized for propaganda and bias (as the article shows). Some balance there is needed. Also note that India has had a Muslim president, Abdul Kalam. I hope that you would find the time to look into this matter. Thanks and have a great day.72.179.43.232 (talk) 14:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable at first glance, I'll have a look at the article. --tickle me 06:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thankspam

Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.

Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board.

Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better.

Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith (talk), 22:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Denbot (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Louis Beam

I have nominated Louis Beam, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Beam. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Black Kite 18:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Julius Klinger Ankerbrot 1938.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Julius Klinger Ankerbrot 1938.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of David Littman (historian)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is David Littman (historian). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Littman (historian). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tickle me! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Élisabeth Badinter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Habib Malik - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proll

On 16 February, you tagged Proll with {{rfd}}, but you did not complete the nomination by listing it at WP:RFD. Can you please complete the second step of the nomination per the instructions at the WP:RFD page? If you do not list it within a reasonable amount of time, I'll assume you no longer wish to see it deleted and will remove the template. Thanks. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:51, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edward Said thowing a stone at Israeli soldiers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edward Said thowing a stone at Israeli soldiers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Malcolm Gladwell criticism

Thought I'd let you know, criticism of Gladwell's unscientific approach abounds and I've included much of it.--Louiedog (talk) 04:07, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to check the article presently, but you're onto something. As far as I know, he's an engaging and gifted writer, but a quack scientifically. --tickle me 15:47, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for an edit on it.wp

Please assist I would like to modify the Italian version of Everything That Happens Will Happen Today, but I can't seem to figure out the template. It's a pretty straight-forward and small change I would like to make: the infobox says that it's the chronology of only Brian Eno, but it's really the chronology of Brian Eno and David Byrne (see the English version of the page if I'm not making sense here.) Do you think you can amend this for me? Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:09, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like that? The it template doesn't allow extra chronologies via | Misc = {{Extra chronology, though. --tickle me 11:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly It still reads "Brian Eno – cronologia", which is inaccurate. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sanremofilo reverted my edit, he's afraid automated categorization might not work anymore. I hope you battle that out on it:talk, as I wouldn't like to count as a vandal there, nor do I want to take the time to engage. --tickle me 23:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sheesh Thanks for trying. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth I left a message with my awful, broken Italian; maybe he can help. Thanks again for trying. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Edward Said thowing a stone at Israeli soldiers.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Edward Said thowing a stone at Israeli soldiers.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 06:40, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Norman Stillman Professor and Schusterman-Josey Chair in Judaic History.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Norman Stillman Professor and Schusterman-Josey Chair in Judaic History.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Sorry, aber seit damals (2006) haben sich die Regeln geändert...

Regards, HaeB (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Norman Stillman Professor and Schusterman-Josey Chair in Judaic History.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Norman Stillman Professor and Schusterman-Josey Chair in Judaic History.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Meggendorfer Blätter 27.03.1930.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Meggendorfer Blätter 27.03.1930.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of YaleGlobal Online

A tag has been placed on YaleGlobal Online, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 06:47, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Julius Klinger Tabu Poster 1919.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Julius Klinger Tabu Poster 1919.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Julius Klinger Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Julius Klinger Portrait.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Cloud Club main dining room mural painting.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cloud Club main dining room mural painting.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

afd Heinrich Böll Foundation

Nomination of Heinrich Böll Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heinrich Böll Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ Heinrich Böll Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

nomination should be withdrawn asap, I commented there. --tickle me 14:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Hassan moussa sheikh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hassan moussa sheikh.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 06:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Zero interest-rate policy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Zero interest-rate policy, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. greenrd (talk) 22:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baking soda / Baking powder

As far as I can tell, Baking soda is the common name for Sodium bicarbonate, not Baking powder. You just made a redirect that is contrary to that. Lou Sander (talk) 15:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Redo Backup and Recovery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ubuntu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ein Bier für Sie!

Thnx for the helping hand with Tarrush Polentarion Talk 17:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification - BLP

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tickle me. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scholars for Peace in the Middle East

An editor (not me) has nominated Scholars for Peace in the Midddle East for deletion without notifying you. E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:25, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tickle me. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

I am posting this on your talkpage out of an abundance of caution solely because you recently edited Talk:Sarah Jeong and, as the message says, not suggesting any policy violation by you. (I realize that you were made aware of this two years back too). Abecedare (talk) 01:33, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

> I realize that you were made aware of this two years back too

Aware of what? Doing nothing wrong and getting a warning anyway? Can't remember. This is Orwellian, thanks but no thanks. --tickle me 03:33, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, if I was not clear. This is just an informational message (not a warning), as the one posted two years back was too. The message was re-posted only because arbcom requires that editors who may potentially be effected by discretionary sanctions, be made aware of the policies within the last year. The parenthetical remark was simply intended as an acknowledgement that the message may be redundant; not a snide comment about your conduct now or then (which I haven't even looked into). Abecedare (talk) 03:41, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about your comment but about the whole procedure and the ongoings with the article in question. The NYT announces a hire, then defends that hire the next day after criticism that's been reported on in reputable media. We report the hire pretty much immediately but not the consequences, quite to the contrary, even the talk page gets sort of semi-protected. --tickle me 03:51, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tickle me. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asian Centre for Human Rights for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asian Centre for Human Rights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Centre for Human Rights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robin DiAngelo

If you believe Robin DiAngelo is not notable enough for an article (as it appears you do) you should just nominate it for deletion through WP:AFD, rather than endlessly restoring the notability tag at the top of the page. IntoThinAir (talk) 05:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tickle me,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tickle me,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tickle me,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Volcker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David McNally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fixed. --tickle me 09:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:User Tickle me political compass.gif

The file File:User Tickle me political compass.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, uploaded for use in the User space (all edits that included it appear to have since been deleted), unlikely to have future encyclopedic value.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 00:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick (Talk) 12:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I find this bewildering, I can't even recover my edits ("One revision of this difference (966284294) was not found.") to understand what I did wrong. If I recall my edit correctly I guess now that should have rewritten the SPLC's statement instead of copying it verbatim. As the SPLC is considered a relevant source and the accusations are grave a note asking me for a rewrite would have been quite enough. tickle me 06:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AP + BLP discretionary sanctions alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Johnuniq (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Johnuniq (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP is becoming a kafkaesque nightmare. tickle me 08:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on racial hereditarianism at the R&I talk-page

An RfC at Talk:Race and intelligence revisits the question, considered last year at WP:FTN, of whether or not the theory that a genetic link exists between race and intelligence is a fringe theory. This RfC supercedes the recent RfC on this topic at WP:RSN that was closed as improperly formulated.

Your participation is welcome. Thank you. NightHeron (talk) 22:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Jack Posobiec for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:32, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WSJ Lede RfC

Hello Tickle me (talk · contribs), we are currently engaging in a discussion around the WSJ lede statement concerning the Journal’s editorial board. You made a change to this statement in the past. If you’d like to contribute to this conversation, please join us at Talk:The Wall Street Journal under the heading “Should editorial opinions be posted in the lede summary.” Take care. Stallion55347 (talk) 01:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Salah Choudhury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salah Choudhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salah Choudhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Arunudoy - talk 08:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Servus

The article Servus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not belong in an encyclopedia, is already in Wiktionary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Why me? tickle me 06:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Law Enforcement Agency Resource Network

The article Law Enforcement Agency Resource Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't obviously meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC - a website with barely trivial mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:43, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anti-Racism Information Service

The article Anti-Racism Information Service has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to meet WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Madragoa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Madragoa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Madragoa

Hello, Tickle me. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Madragoa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Madragoa

Hello, Tickle me. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Madragoa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]