User talk:Thepulse2007

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Thepulse2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Pan Dan 14:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Rippleside Elementary, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Pan Dan 14:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2000s

Good job creating those links on 2000s. It's just what the article needed. Unschool 07:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks for your work recently on the List of social networking websites page. Unfortunately, your amendment to the description could be construed as stating a personal opinion, rather than addition of a neutral point of view. Your amendment has therefore been reverted. Your future editing experience will be better advanced by using the sandbox. Thanks. Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 11:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clique

Hi. I saw you added a link to a movie on the see also section of this article - but the movie doesn't have an article, and I've never heard of the movie. Please write the movie's article before linking to it. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to 2007, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Corvus cornix 23:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ocatecir Talk 00:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ocatecir Talk 00:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Jay-Z, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 00:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Emo pop (music), by 195.137.30.238 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Emo pop (music) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

original research


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Emo pop (music), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continued insertion of unverified information

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gobblers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gobblers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Emo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TheLetterM (talk) 22:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated insertion of unverified information or original analysis despite warnings and prior blocks. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — TKD::Talk 04:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion for you: Please take this time to read our core content policies, including verifiability, no original research, and neutral point of view. It appears that you do have a great interest in some topics that need work on Wikipedia, and we welcome new contributions, but we are first and foremost striving to become a reputable encyclopedia, so we have to maintain certain expectations on content. Edits such as [1] and [2] don't add to the verifiable content that readers expect to find. You've been warned multiple times about this; please contribute constructively when your block expires. — TKD::Talk 04:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Disney Channel, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mhking (talk) 03:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated insertion of unverified information or original analysis despite warnings and prior blocks. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 19:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lindsay Lohan, you will be blocked from editing. Kww (talk) 01:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to High School Musical (soundtrack). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. NrDg 04:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to MySpace. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. DiverseMentality (Talk) (Contribs) 00:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

This is your final warning for all edits concerning any topics to which you have added unsourced original research. Stop. If you continue, you will be blocked for increasing periods of time, starting at 3 weeks. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing your edit history, the duration of the problematic behavior, and your unwillingness to respond appropriately to previous blocks and warnings, 3 months seems more appropriate.
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 3 months as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. -- The Anome (talk) 13:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to 2012 doomsday prediction, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. You changed cited information, ie you changed 2010, the figure in the source, to 2009 Dougweller (talk) 05:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect information added to sourced sentence

See: Talk:Myspace#incorrect_quote

Not surprisingly, I see that you have been sloppy in the past adding sources (above).

If this continues you can be blocked for such behavior, as it ruins the reliability of wikipedia. Adamtheclown (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

A discussion at WP:ANI involves you: please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#600 vandalism edits. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:54, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 04:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]