User talk:Themaddzhatter

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Themaddzhatter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Evan Starkman, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kevin (talk) 05:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Evan Starkman has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.


If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kevin (talk) 05:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Evan Starkman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Starkman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Starkman

Thanks for the valiant effort. Yes, it does look better, but as far as I can tell there are still problems. This does not have so much to do with what you have done, but the lack of things that Evan Starkman has done. However, this is my opinion. But, if you want, here are some pointers. By the way, you can just tell me to fix it myself. You can find most of this in WP:MOSBIO.

  1. The opening should have the subject's name in bold, you can add bold by placing three apostrophes on each side, '''Evan Starkman''' renders as Evan Starkman
  2. Per WP:BLP, we need a reliable source for his real name.
  3. "He is seen as one of the strongest..." is WP:POV without a source.
  4. We should refer to him as Starkman, and not Evan in the article, see we are not his personal friend, per WP:MOSBIO.
  5. There should be a separate section for his charitable work, and clothing line. This is probably the only thing that might save the article, so it should be emphasized, otherwise it's mostly WP:ONEEVENT.

Let me know if you have any further questions. The main reason I haven't fixed these things myself, is that I still think he isn't notable enough. However, that's my opinion. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's even better. I think that is about as good as it's going to get. We shall see how the WP:AFD plays out. I still think that notability is an issue, but others may disagree. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evan Starkman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evan Starkman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Starkman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Maile (talk) 00:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]