User talk:Theinactivist/Archive 1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, Theinactivist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jokestress (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Jokestress! Theinactivist (talkcontribs) 21:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for contributing an improved version in your recent edits in Gender Identity Disorder!

Also, if you're interested in reading the full text of the presentation and discussion of GID at the 2003 APA meeting described in Controversy Continues to Grow Over DSM’s GID Diagnosis, which you added as a source, I found a transcript at APA roundtable on gender variance and DSM-V... there's much more depth of detail and nuance presented (naturally, since it was a fairly lengthy symposium!)...

-- bonze blayk (talk) 12:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your compliment and the resource. I will enjoy getting a more complete view of the medical aspects of this debate. Theinactivist (talkcontribs) 23:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gender identity disorder, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Note to any human beings who follow this: Theinactivist's edit was perhaps incorrect (?), and probably SHOULD have been detected by Cluebot NG, but it was in an attempt to revert a rather complicated cycle of vandalism in the article on Gender identity disorder, which Theinactivist successfully repaired here.
Thanks Bonze, I'm just going to delete this note in a few days if the people at ClueBot don't place an update for my report (that is appropriate, right?). Something I read on a Talk page gave me the impression that I could revert to a previous version by undoing multiple edits in a row. Still not sure if this is true, but I found a way around that. Theinactivist (talkcontribs) 21:33, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
You're welcome; it is possible to back out several bad/vandal edits by executing "undo" commands from the last to the first, but it's not exactly simple.  ??? The thing here is that Cluebot NG's flagging of your edit was kind of correct (from a perspective robotic ;-) I checked into the process for noting that Cluebot NG has incorrectly flagged an edit, but that's not what you want, so? Maybe it's best to leave the clueless thing's report here. thanks! -- bonze blayk (talk) 21:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC) -- And note: Cluebot NG really does nail a lot of vandalism, ergo, maybe best just let Rover here do hir thing ;-) -- bonze blayk (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)