User talk:Tex66436

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tex66436 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I blieve this is a mistake I need a Different Adminstrator to review

Decline reason:

even if you're not a sock, you seem only interested in vandalism. RlevseTalk 17:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tex66436 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I blieve this is a mistake I would like to request another Adminstrator to review

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tex66436 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I strongly believe this block it's too harsh can another admin review this please thank you

Decline reason:

I agree with Jpgordon, all your edits have been disruptive. — -- lucasbfr talk 18:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tex66436 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

still yet the block needs review and I STRONGLY agree this is way too harsh and it needs to be reviewed firther because Iam a new user and i did not intend to disrupt any edits so I appreciate if the admins had a chat about this because believe me this is too harsh thank you

Decline reason:

Hi. I'm the fourth and last admin to review your block and agree with the rest. I've also protected your page to prevent a fifth request for review, as four should be sufficient. — LaraLove 18:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you'd like to discuss this block without the use of the unblock template, feel free to do so here. LaraLove 18:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]