User talk:TamaraStaples
|
The Prince's Trust
Please do not revert my edit again. If you check the sources for this content (you may have even added them originally), they don't actually back up the content they are used to source. Some of the content (especially involving experience of one individual, and also the financial situtation) is verifiable, but is worded in a way to imply something negative that is not present in the source. This is a blatant violation of the neutral point of view. Additionally, one of the sources you restored is a blog, which is not a reliable source for controversial information. And finally, the quote you restored is taken completely out of context, and used to craft a criticism of the organization that was intended as merely hypothetical. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:18, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
I didn't revert everything, I actually went through the chnages individually, and I thought that the things that I had put back were OK. I accept what you say about not using blogs as a reference, but sometimes things said on authorative blogs can be useful. Sometimes it is also useful to summarise financial information to try and explain what it means.
- The problem comes when a summary is used to make an implication that is not obvious from the raw information, but rather is the opinion of the summarizer. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Annabel Kanabus moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Annabel Kanabus, is essentially a press release for the subject I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 06:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Annabel Kanabus (February 4)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annabel Kanabus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Annabel Kanabus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, TamaraStaples!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
|
Your draft article, Draft:Annabel Kanabus
Hello, TamaraStaples. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Annabel Kanabus".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |