User talk:TaerkastUA/Archives/2022/March

IBM

In this reversion, you reverted all of my changes instead of just replacing "chairperson" to "chairman". This is very frustrating. Also which source says that the company uses these titles? I had also added archives and reformmatted citations —CrafterNova ^{[ TALK ]  [ CONT ]} 18:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Apologies, my eyesight isn't that good. IBM itself uses those titles for the positions. Kind regards --Tærkast (Discuss) 19:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

@TaerkastUA: But we need at least one independent reliable source confirming that the company uses those titles for the positions. Also, I think people with impaired eyesight should use Job Access With Speech (JAWS) screen reader or avoid editing unless eyesight is recovered. When I restored some meaningful edits to the article, some content got duplicated, so someone has to fix that, as I'm busy today. Thank you —CrafterNova ^{[ TALK ]  [ CONT ]} 02:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Also, I think people with impaired eyesight should use Job Access With Speech (JAWS) screen reader or avoid editing unless eyesight is recovered. Wow. Good thing you're not making the decisions about who should or shouldn't edit. If only one could fix eyesight with the touch of a button. By the way, not that it's any of your business, my eyesight is generally fine (not brilliant, but fine), I so happened to have made an oversight. Oversights are easy to make, chill out. Secondly, most companies still primarily use chairman regardless of your personal feelings towards its usage, and you will find that most company articles don't cite the hell out of the infoboxes unnecessarily (with regards to job titles). If you wish to do so, and there are quite a few company articles, however, go ahead, this isn't worth getting stressed and aggravated over. --Tærkast (Discuss) 17:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)