User talk:TIggI140

November 2020

Hello, I'm 4thfile4thrank. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sergei Parajanov, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 02:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at William James Sidis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logging out to repeat the same edits, such as via User:2605:E000:61CC:4000:DCEC:F32E:E0BA:5B7F, is not allowed. DMacks (talk) 07:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TIggI140, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TIggI140! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bea Benaderet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 23:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Vivien Leigh, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop repeating the same edit. It has been reverted multiple times by different editors, including from when you were editing as an IP. DrKay (talk) 08:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits

Hi TIggI140, I've recently reverted your edit(s) on the Leonardo da Vinci article. Looking at your contributions, every single edit you have made as of this message has been reverted. This is because you are making claims and adding information that is not supported by appropriate reference(s); for claims on ethnicity (which can be controversial) this is especially important, see WP:CITE. You've been warned four times above my message, if you continue to edit in this manner you may be blocked from further editing. Aza24 (talk) 00:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You have been repeatedly making changes to people's ethnicities, describing them as "Armenian", without providing any sources or justification for these changes. In most cases this description is inaccurate, or irrelevant, and in every case your changes have been reverted. Please stop. – bradv🍁 21:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dustin Hoffman, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 12:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 06:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately after coming off this block, you performed the same edits. You are therefore re-blocked. DrKay (talk) 07:06, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you are continuing to edit in the same topic area as an IP, which is contrary to our policy on sock puppetry, I have now blocked your account indefinitely. DrKay (talk) 08:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]