User talk:TBSchemer
Barack Obama
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
- I would suggest engaging more thoroughly on the talkpage at this article. This is beneficial to both the community, and your own efforts if you would like them to become stable. Jeremy112233 (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, just a friendly reminder read Wikipedia:General sanctions/Obama article probation, if you've not done so already. Your most recent edit [1] to Talk:Barack_Obama leads me to suggest that you follow the advice therein:
- Do not edit-war;
- Interact civilly with other editors;
- Avoid making repeated comments unrelated to bettering the article;
- Avoid making repeated comments about the subject of the article;
- Avoid repeatedly discussing other editors, discuss the article instead;
- Not much leeway in pages under probation, so basically be a model Wikipedian;
- We actually know when we cross the line; we are all intelligent people;
- Don't get worked up when you get subjected to remedies such as a temporary block or ban. Take a break and come back refreshed.
Happy editing! JoeSperrazza (talk) 18:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, remember the warning, above? This edit [2] is the start of an edit war - see WP:EW. You don't have to violate WP:3RR to be subject to sanctions. Please stop reverting, be patient, and discuss. Opening an WP:RFC is the next step. JoeSperrazza (talk) 19:20, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
3 R warning
You are in danger of getting in trouble over the three R Rule on the Democratic Party article. Please try to get a consensus on the talk page-- something you are recommending for everyone else except yourself. Rjensen (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, TBSchemer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, TBSchemer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:RobertLathamBrown.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)