User talk:Suryansh Rathore

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

August 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm InvadingInvader. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chandel (Rajput clan) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. InvadingInvader (talk) 21:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vro That someone copy-pasted the same thing on that page and wrote it again. Look clearly vro

History Chandelas of Kumaon History Chandelas of Kumaon 🗿same thing smae source Suryansh Rathore (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. InvadingInvader (talk) 04:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I also may suggest, consider listing your dispute as a request for a third opinion. You can ask an outside editor what they think. If you wish, do to at this page. InvadingInvader (talk) 04:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Information icon Hi Suryansh Rathore! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Chandel (Rajput clan) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Chandel (Rajput clan), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 00:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 04:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Awadh (1226)

Hi Suryansh Rathore. In your new article, Battle of Awadh (1226), you used {{sfn}} templates without providing full cites. {{sfn}} templates aren't just free text, they need to link to a full cite elsewhere in the article (e.g. {{cite book}} for instance). These need to be supplied for each work your using. If you need more information on how referencing works I suggest reading WP:REFB, it helped be when I was first starting. I see you've done the same at Keeratrai Chandel, you will need to go back and add all the missing cites there as well. If you have any questions please ask. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 21:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir but I need some times Coz I'm new here Suryansh Rathore (talk) 21:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vro can you help me i don't know how to add link correctly I just read book from inscriptions and filled. Suryansh Rathore (talk) 21:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REFB shows how to do basic referencing, which I suggest you start with. {{sfn}} templates are not for beginners, as they have a few complications. Have a look WP:REFB, and have a go at correcting the references at Keeratrai Chandel. If you get stuck please just drop a note on my talk page or here. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 10:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Moradabad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Moradabad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

War of Kakadadaha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, War of Kakadadaha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Awadh (1226) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Awadh (1226), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Castecruft

Please do not add the "Purbiya Rajput" castecruft to the articles on Chandela kings. Even if the dynasty's supposed Purbiya origin was supported by a reliable source (which is not the case), there is no need to add the statement that "xyz was the Purbiya Rajput king" to every article - stating that "xyz was a Chandela king" is sufficient. Any discussion about the connection between the Chandelas and the Purbiyas should be limited to the main article on the dynasty, with proper citations. utcursch | talk 23:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Purbiya means who was the king of purvanchal known as purbiya because the capital of Vidyadhar was kalinjar, up Suryansh Rathore (talk) 05:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of {{sfn}} templates

Hi Suryansh Rathore. I just came across your new article Bhallaldeva Chandel, and have moved it to draft space. You must stop using {{sfn}} templates without full cites. Please read WP:REFB on how referencing works on Wikipedia, it really will help you -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 14:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keeratrai Chandel

Hello again. The same problem exists at Keeratrai Chandel, again you've added {{sfn}} templates without anything to link to. Once you have read WP:REFB you need to go back and correct "Hindustānī - Volume 36 1975", "Mug̲h̲ala darabāra, kavi-saṅgītajña: san Ī, 1531-1707 - & Śāligrāma Gupta 1999", and "Hindustānī - Volume 36 1975". I really suggest you stop trying to use {{sfn}}s until you have a better understanding of how referencing is meant to work. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 14:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any questions, do please just ask. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 14:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but I need some time vro please don't delete page 🗿 Suryansh Rathore (talk) 14:52, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry no articles have been deleted, you can find the one I moved at draft:Bhallaldeva Chandel. Once you've corrected the referencing feel free to move it back to article space. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 16:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank's Suryansh Rathore (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Keeratrai Chandel
added links pointing to Mughal and Garg
Chandel (Rajput clan)
added a link pointing to Chedi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keeratrai Chandel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Gangolihat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Gangolihat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to be made factually accurate as well as neutral and objective. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to have been a short and minor encounter. If there is not much to say about the topic, it does not need a separate article. So, please also help demonstrate the topic is notable (see WP:GNG). Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vijayapala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirttivarman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paramardi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prithviraj.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Moradabad (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Battle of Moradabad instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please merge article and draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Suryansh Rathore! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chandelas, you may be blocked from editing. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 01:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to Vaidhya,R. K. Dikshit, Bilaspur past and present gazzeteer and gazzeteer of chedi chandelas were vrishni rajput so what happen? Suryansh Rathore (talk) 05:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Suryansh Rathore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not fake id or anything please unban me & for Chandrlas of Jejakabhukti i used historical sources by vaidhya, CV ojha, Majumdar, Satishchandra, gazzeteer of chedi and himachal & before blocking me you need to Reed sources so please unban me Suryansh Rathore (talk) 07:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no block on this account directly. In order to be able to look into this, we will need to know the exact message that appears when you attempt to make an edit. I see that you edited about five and a half hours before making this request, did something about your cirumstances change in that time? (don't need specifics) 331dot (talk) 09:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


no they said I'm :Sockpuppet of Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur and blocked me so I don't know who is akshay so please unblock me

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jagat Chand Chandel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garhwal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-Paste Move

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Battle of Basantpur a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Battle of Basantpur. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Awadh (1225)

Hello, Suryansh Rathore,

Thank you for creating Battle of Awadh (1225).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please write this article in correct English. It has been tagged for clean up but it make take many months or even years before other editors address these issues. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You will have more chance of getting your drafts approved if you clean them up first yourself. This can be quite a challenge if you are not a native speaker and until you have provided reliable and verifiable sources other users might not be ready to help. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 19:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

You've already been informed about WP:V and WP:RS above, so I'm going to keep this brief: please do not cite a reference in an article if it doesn't support the article content.

You have been doing this persistently. For example, the lead of the article Kirttivarman II (Chandel) cites six references, none of which even mention the word "Kirttivarman". The last reference mentions "Keerat Singh", but does not suggest that his dynasty was a linear continuation of the imperial Chandela dynasty.

Battle of Keeratsagar cites 3 sources (each of them two times). None of the sources have page numbers, and none of the books mention the battle described in the article.

Nearly all your contributions have such problems. Validating your edits is a huge time waster for others, and you will end up getting blocked permanently if you continue to add fake references. utcursch | talk 06:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honourable admin!Refference are not fake bruh Kirtti-Varman is keeratsingh and keeratsingh is Keeratrai like paramardideva -paramardi-parmaal

Also battle of Keeratsagar sagar source belong to ASI report Alha the lay of etc before saying anything read first so sir you should read whole linage of Kirttivarman ii in you word keertsingh Suryansh Rathore (talk) 06:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paramardi conquest of Dasharna moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Paramardi conquest of Dasharna, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Kalinjar (1202) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Siege of Kalinjar (1202), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Siege of Kalinjar (1202)

Notice

The article Siege of Kalinjar (1202) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The prose of this article doesn't appear to have anything to do with the current title. No indication as to what the subject of this article is actually supposed to be.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 22:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Mandogarh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Mandogarh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 11:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Parmaalraso is Contemporary source 1189 sir Suryansh Rathore (talk) 11:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Paramardi into Siege of Kalinjar (1202-1203). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:55, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirttivarman II (Chandel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hada.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Udyot Chand's invasion of ChandpurGarh and Udyot Chand's invasion of Badhangarh

Articles that you have been involved in editing—Udyot Chand's invasion of ChandpurGarh and Udyot Chand's invasion of Badhangarh—have been proposed for merging with Udyot Chand. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- RoySmith (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Suryansh_Rathore"