User talk:Sunriseshore

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wolmido, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Korean films (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Outer Banks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatoan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of conflicts in North America, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Battle of Quebec and English America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Indigenous peoples of the Northeastern Woodlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Croatoan, Rappahannock and Monacan

Outline of war (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chandragupta and Wang Jin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Post-classical history, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden meaning in links

Just an FYI, per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking, please don't hid where your link is going buried in the syntax. See MOS:EGG for more information. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sunriseshore! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I am Moxy and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For hard work on the important subject of Post-classical history. Thanks! (But I'd love it if you could write edit summaries in your future work: they're really helpful when you're trying to track how an article has developed!) Alarichall (talk) 21:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of East Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sui (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you review the sources?

Its a great resource to get info from others wiki articles....but there is a concern that you actually have not seen the sources you have moved over......must remember you need to seen and verify the source to use them....dont assume the sources are correct. Plus best not to move unsourced info at all. This is just a heads up!---Moxy (talk) 23:37, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is your specific concern, with what information, and what source? Sunriseshore (talk) 04:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Standard greeting

Welcome to Wikipedia, UtDicitur! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I am Moxy and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Modern History

Hi Sunriseshore. I see you have nominated Modern History for a GA review. Currently it has three large orange tags at the top. This means it qualifies for a quick fail. You are a new and keen editor so I thought I would see if you wanted to withdraw the nomination. Feel free to ask me any questions on the GA process or anything else here. AIRcorn (talk) 08:50, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sunriseshore. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re. the GAN for Visa policy of Azerbaijan

Hello, I see that you have passed my good article nomination! Thank you for that. I am just enquiring as to when you will set the article as a good article? Kind regards, -ASHEIOU (THEY/THEM • TALK) 16:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not realize I had to do that,

I suppose I will add the template right away. Sunriseshore (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya,

I've gone ahead and updated it myself. In future, I'd recommend getting the GANReviewTool. It allows you to quickly close GANs without having to manually do much, you just select pass/fail and fill out the little form it gives you. I find it a lifesaver!
-ASHEIOU (THEY/THEM • TALK) 16:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Post-classical history

The article Post-classical history you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Post-classical history for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wretchskull -- Wretchskull (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into History of the Southern United States. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Mound Builders. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I have done so for you this time, but hope you will follow best practices yourself next time.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.~~~~ S Philbrick (Talk) 12:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have given many many attributions. Please accept my apologies for letting that one slip by. I am trying to make sure that Native Peoples get more represenation in an article that includes their ancesteral lands. Thanks! Sunriseshore (talk) 12:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out! Sunriseshore (talk) 12:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on History of the Southern United States

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of the Southern United States, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Borsoka (talk) 15:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see the report that you have made. The link is insufficient notice. Sunriseshore (talk) 15:51, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This notice is sufficient. If you want to respond to the complaint, you may do so.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The link does not take me to the complaint, I do not see where it is. Sunriseshore (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected

I see it now Sunriseshore (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]