User talk:Sukh.editor

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Sukh.editor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Andy Dingley (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for welcome. I will.be creating a new article soon. Sukh.editor (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Jasbeer Singh (author), from its old location at User:Sukh.editor/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 17:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasbeer Singh (author) (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bishal Shrestha was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sukh.editor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Walking With my Soul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walking With my Soul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walking With my Soul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 14:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article "Walking with my soul" notable

Hi Article Walking with my soul I have added has many links also added fro reference. For notable I have added Daily excelsior news paper link which is a leading news paper of the state. Added reviews of India blooms and good reads as well.

Please let me know what can be added to make it verified.

Thanks Sukh.editor (talk) 15:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia's special definition of a notable book; merely being reviewed and appearing on websites does not make it notable. No amount of editing makes some thing notable; it depends on the criteria and significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Do you have an association with this book, its author, or its publisher? 331dot (talk) 16:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am just writing my first article which I have read

Possible multiple accounts and COI

Further to your recent post at the Teahouse, I noticed there seems to be a quite a lot of overlap between your edits and that of User:Jasbeersingh05. It might be coincidence, but you should know that we do not allow one person to operate two accounts at the same time here, especially if they are both solely promoting the same narrow topic - namely, a book deemed and deleted as non-notable which was published just a couple of weeks before your first ever edits here. We call these accounts WP:SOCKPUPPETS and they are liable to be investigated and possibly blocked from editing. I do want to assume good faith, but if these two accounts are related, and you've simply forgotten the login password for the first account, you really should make a declaration of the two accounts being created by the same person and of your conflict of interest in editing to promote that book/author. Even if you refind the other login password, you should not use it again, as this would now be your active account.

Of course, if they're not related, then be aware that POV-pushing and promotion on very narrow topics may still lead to further questions and investigations if both accounts are seen to be operating at the same time on the same narrow subject. And any conflict of interest (friend of the author etc) should still be declared per WP:COI. This isn't intended to scare or intimidate you - just to appraise you of how we operate. You might wish to indicate below whether or not these two accounts are or are not related, so as to avoid future confusion. Kind regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 21:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, this is my account sukh.editor. I have just written a new article and sent it for review. I am using this account for wiki only.Sukh.editor (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK thank you, but you've not answered my question. Would you mind confirming if the two accounts are operated by two completely different, unrelated people? You have confused me by also editing their account talk page, too. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am operating this account only. No other account is mine.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sukh.editor. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 02:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Draft:Jasbeer Singh (author) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jasbeer Singh (author), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi, I am currently collecting more information on this. I will be updating it soon.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehjoor Nagar Sikh massacre has been accepted

Mehjoor Nagar Sikh massacre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jasbeer Singh (author)

Hello, Sukh.editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jasbeer Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasbeer Singh (author) (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nightenbelle were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
One collection of poems with 2 reviews does not qualify for a WP article. Most sources are either primary, not WP:RS or do not give significant coverage. 2 are book reviews aprox. 1 paragraph in length- these are the only two that contribute to notability, but not enough to establish the subject qualifies for a WP article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nightenbelle (talk) 17:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jasbeer Singh (author)

Hello, Sukh.editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jasbeer Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Sukh.editor"